By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Captain America: Civil War – BIG RANT and many plot spoilers inside (you should save your time and money and not see it now)

JWeinCom said:
Zanten said:
Your dislike seems to hinge largely from the fact that it isn't specifically a lighthearted popcorn flick, I'm surmising? o.o Considering the title of it was literally 'Civil War,' I've got to point out there really is no particularly positive way this ever could have gone. If your argument is they should have just not bothered doing Civil War in any form, then fair enough, but otherwise I can only really say I'm surprised nobody died.

And the thing is, I actually feel the movie handled it MUCH better than the comic storyline it was based on ever did. Both Tony and Steve actually behave just as I'd have expected them to, given their experiences and actions in all their lead-up films, (by which I mean all the Iron Man movies, both prior Captain America movies, and both Avengers movies,) and I absolutely saw how those experiences would make them behave that way. Both Winter Soldier and Age of Ultron are obviously the biggest examples, but all the prior movies have hints of it here and there. Now, was it 'right' in a moral sense for Tony to confine Scarlet Witch to the base, or recruit a literal teenager for a superpowered fistfight, or for Steve to run off with Bucky rather than returning his unconscious ass to the cell to work things out? Probably not, but they honestly make sense for the characters. =P Not only do I see why they did what they ultimately did, I think it was the inevitable course they'd take, i.e. I honestly couldn't see them acting any differently, not without having changed their characters in all their previous movies.

The thing is, Marvel comics was always ABOUT 'real life,' it was actually something that set it apart from DC. Whereas characters like Superman or Batman were meant to be more symbolic paragons than real people- though obviously they've been fleshed out by various writers over the years- Marvel quite often explored extremely flawed characters. Peter Parker was a nerdy, often financially unsteady teenager, Tony Stark was an alcoholic, Bruce Banner and the Hulk have probably collectively had every mental issue imaginable. The X-Men were symbols of racial intolerance and bigotry, exploring those themes on a regular basis. Even Thor spent a long ass time banished to Earth in a human body due to his arrogance. (I don't just mean the first movie, I mean this was an actual thing in the comics.) More recent examples include the Blue Marvel, a very on-the-nose look at racism back in the day.

Now, obviously there were more fantastical elements, and characters as well, but ultimately a lot of Marvel's stories were far more grounded by, as you said, real life. =P

Ironically DC was typically more about what you described; not creating fleshed-out, flawed human beings, but rather morally flawless paragons. Superman in particular was always supposed to be the very best of them all, and it's one of the reasons Man of Steel and ESPECIALLY BvS have been panned; because this Superman doesn't always seem like a very GOOD person, let alone a great one. xP


Anywho, I could go in more detail, buuuut I'm not sure how much has already been covered in the discussion held. o.o If you're interested in hearing more I could have something ready by tomorrow night, probably. =D

Kind of off topic, but this gives me an excuse to rant.  This was indeed 1000000 times better than the comic book.  Fist off, it was a good decision to have Iron Man actual involved one of the inciting event.  I don't buy Tony being willing to fight to this degree because a random dead kid's mom was sad about it and yelled at him.  When he was actually the cause of the kid dying it makes much more sense.  Likewise, having Bucky's life on the line made Captain America seem like more than just a stubborn ass.

Iron Man was like a straight up supervillain in the comics.  Locking up heroes and villains without due process, forcing supervillains to fight for him, cloning his dead friends to serve as soldiers, and so on.  Millar just slaps you on the face with the fact that Cap, despite being an asshole, is right.  

And that's not to even mention Spider-man unmasking.  Spider-man keeps his identity a secret because people might try to kill his family otherwise.  And after he unmasks... someone tries to kill his family.  I can almost buy Spider-man supporting registration (although it's something he's basically been against all of his life).  But unmasking?  Not because the law requires it but AS A FUCKING PUBLICITY STUNT?  Ridiculous.

It's disturbing that when many people think of great comic book stories they think of Civil War.  THAT is an example of characters acting in ludicrous ways simply to get from set piece to set piece.

/rant

I had been curious to read the comics for a long time, but, after reading your posts, I don't feel like it anymore.



Around the Network
d21lewis said:
I'm just watching the debate. Very impressive. I love seeing different points of view.

This thread made me watch BvS last night, out of curiosity. 

The first half had was tight and good, thanks to Jesse Eisenberg. Not sure why people wanted someone else for the role. He was great. The second half was boring. 

Both movies were bad overall, both didn't impress me. I'd rate both similarly. 

Keep in mind, I never grabbed a comic book.



Its an amazing movie, realy. No need to write a pagelong essay just because you disagree with the vast majority of critics and viewers.

LurkerJ said:
d21lewis said:
I'm just watching the debate. Very impressive. I love seeing different points of view.

This thread made me watch BvS last night, out of curiosity. 

The first half had was tight and good, thanks to Jesse Eisenberg. Not sure why people wanted someone else for the role. He was great. The second half was boring. 

Both movies were bad overall, both didn't impress me. I'd rate both similarly. 

Keep in mind, I never grabbed a comic book.

Sounds to me like you don't like action movies, as you disliked the action portion of BvS and tought CW, one of the most action packed movies ever, was boring. Boring is a word I never seen used to describe CW before realy.



I find it curious that some here are saying this WASN'T a lighthearted popcorn flick. Did we watch the same movie?



DakonBlackblade said:

Its an amazing movie, realy. No need to write a pagelong essay just because you disagree with the vast majority of critics and viewers.

LurkerJ said:

This thread made me watch BvS last night, out of curiosity. 

The first half had was tight and good, thanks to Jesse Eisenberg. Not sure why people wanted someone else for the role. He was great. The second half was boring. 

Both movies were bad overall, both didn't impress me. I'd rate both similarly. 

Keep in mind, I never grabbed a comic book.

Sounds to me like you don't like action movies, as you disliked the action portion of BvS and tought CW, one of the most action packed movies ever, was boring. Boring is a word I never seen used to describe CW before realy.

There is some truth to that.

Isolated action sequences, with no suspense or an interesting artistic direction, bore me.

Fury Road action sequences were interwined wtih beautiful artistic scenery that kept me watching.

I also liked Edge of Tomorrow and that was an action movie, although the ending was terrible and went against what we learnt during the movie. District 9 was amazing. Transformers was terrible.

Watching Civil War knowing nothing bad can happen to 95% of the cast takes the suspence out of these action scenes, same goes for BvS. BvS spoiler: I knew Superman isn't over, I totally believed he would be back soon enough, and the producers hinted at his come back even  sooner than I thought lol.



Around the Network
LurkerJ said:
d21lewis said:
I'm just watching the debate. Very impressive. I love seeing different points of view.

This thread made me watch BvS last night, out of curiosity. 

The first half had was tight and good, thanks to Jesse Eisenberg. Not sure why people wanted someone else for the role. He was great. The second half was boring. 

Both movies were bad overall, both didn't impress me. I'd rate both similarly. 

Keep in mind, I never grabbed a comic book.

I can't tell you how many times people have liked either the first half or second half only to hate the other part! Maybe it's like two different movies. I liked it throughout, though. Immediately watched it a second time.

I think they're both similar in quality, too. Civil War is better for repeat viewings thanks to more exciting action scenes but they're both good (IMO).



d21lewis said:
LurkerJ said:

This thread made me watch BvS last night, out of curiosity. 

The first half had was tight and good, thanks to Jesse Eisenberg. Not sure why people wanted someone else for the role. He was great. The second half was boring. 

Both movies were bad overall, both didn't impress me. I'd rate both similarly. 

Keep in mind, I never grabbed a comic book.

I can't tell you how many times people have liked either the first half or second half only to hate the other part! Maybe it's like two different movies. I liked it throughout, though. Immediately watched it a second time.

I think they're both similar in quality, too. Civil War is better for repeat viewings thanks to more exciting action scenes but they're both good (IMO).

For me, the first half was solid thanks to some decent dialogue moments and Jesse, whom I ususally can't stand, I wanted him dead or eaten alive in Zombieland. 

And yes, it's baffling why both are received so differently by the critics. Maybe they are fans of the comics and had different expectations? Not that I read any reviews or the comics anyway.

One of Batman's dreaming sequences particularly annoyed me though lol



I agree on the ridiculous part of it.

But I would say you are wrong on putting Captain America on the side of wrong and IronMan on the side of the right or that anyone should lend their deity powers to government to make political use of it. If you saw the movie you saw exactly how bad are politicians when dealing with powerfull beings... Well on any heroes movies and other materials you have the government basically doing the same... but maybe you are more on the side of wanting more power to the government while I'm on the side of the individuals.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

TO be fair, none of the superheroes have reason to trust the governments of the world. Between Shield collapsing, HYdra being a presence on the worldwide scale, and the government serving as antagonists/villains in multiple marvel movies, it makes sense for someone to not trust governments with agendas.

Cap was right in saying that.



My Console Library:

PS5, Switch, XSX

PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360

3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android

Angelus said:
I find it curious that some here are saying this WASN'T a lighthearted popcorn flick. Did we watch the same movie?

Perhaps they are used to sugarcoated experiences.. it was a little more dark than some heroes movies, but it wasn't particularly tense or shaking your ground like Law Abidding Citizen or even Saw.

Runa216 said:
TO be fair, none of the superheroes have reason to trust the governments of the world. Between Shield collapsing, HYdra being a presence on the worldwide scale, and the government serving as antagonists/villains in multiple marvel movies, it makes sense for someone to not trust governments with agendas.

Cap was right in saying that.

That is so much obvious not only in other movies but in this as well. From the start it's obvious that individuals shall be responsible for their actions and power and not bend to other people desires to control them. And then we see the obvious in the ploy against the winter soldier (and by that time it was so obvious IM was being specially dumb, much more when the winter soldier is imprissioned and goes rampant), but then IM goes even dumber on the revenge thing.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."