Can't wait to see the reviews. Game looks like a gamecube game, shorter than an indie game and when you get used to controls it's over. Also it's in a dead system. A recipe for disaster. Metacritic will be fun to see.

Dr.Vita said:

"Ok this game is now really a joke... 
You pay $60 for this game (which looks like a Gamecube game) and it can be completed in 3h? 
This can't be serious from Nintendo..."

Said it again, here is Star Fox GameCube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09NpZkLFRVk, now compare it to Star Fox Zero: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A04ZN4qA740. If you still say it look like a gamecube game then i think you should go to see doctor to check your eyes. Anyway, it was expected from a "sony real gamer"

So nice of them to throw in that "bonus" ... for an extra charge, with no option to buy a physical version separately.  Slick.

Thanks, now I know that if the Gamecube Star Fox game had a better resolution it would look even better than the Wii U Star Fox game.

Baiting 101.

To anyone reading this thread, please ignore whatever daredevil.shark has posted. Thread doesn't need to be dragged into a piss and shit flinging contest.

By all means feel free to criticise any and all aspects of a videogame, but posting just to rub people's noses in it and annoy other members is not going to be tolerated.

SF64 is all about chasing the next highest score meaning you'll be replaying the game practicing and optimizing every time, each time making use of different routes and such. That'll consume quite a bit of time, believe me.

...so is Umbrella Chronicles, and still, that one offers a higher playtime than StarFox Zero, if Gamexplain's report is accurate.

You havent even read the Op, dont you?