However, you can't make that conclusion with absolute certainty. The NoA supervisory line's reaction to Jamie Walton's inquiry was very serious. It wasn't something like, "Thank you for reaching out to us. We'll address this with our employee."; it was "We will handle this IMMEDIATELY. Unacceptable." That kind of response strongly implies that she might have violated a certain clause in their contract or goes against Nintendo's philosphy. Whether you agree with that or not doesn't matter because Nintendo has the right to adhere to certain values and if an employee acts contrary to those values, the company will not tolerate that.

You know the thing that annoys me the most about this whole thing?  If this were about a man, the vast majority of us would not give a damn.  At most, we'd say 'sucks to be him' and go about our business but since this is about a young, not-ugly female, we get 40+ articles pushing a false harassment narrative, petitions, calls for boycotts, devs cancelling games and massive threads across the gaming community.  It's pathetic how thirsty a lot of males involved in video games are.

The people sending death threats because they can't adjust the size of a person's bust really need to reevaluate their lives.

Whenever social justice people say they've received 'death threats' (I say social justice people/progressives/3rd wave feminists because they've cornered  the 'claiming-to-receive-death-threats-online' market), I always assume it's something like a small step above disagreement that's exaggerated for effect or outright lies that are manufactured to increase the amount of money they get on patreon or to teach someone a lesson for 'wrong-think'.  I take nothing that a social progressive or feminist says seriously unless they go to the police and they corroborate their accusations -- and even then, I'm still skeptical because I've seen them lie, exaggerate, put things hilariously out of context and try to destroy lives to push their agendas too many times to take their word at face value.

its not Nintendo's job to actively get involved in their employee's PERSONAL social media pages

its not as if Alison was being harassed as the face of Nintendo or something like that. I would argue that most big company's actually discourage their employees to be hugely active in social media (especialyl with personal opinions) as the opinions may not match up with the company.

in the end though we don't know why EXACTLY she was fired. It could have been that she was literally just poor at her job and the timing happened to be funny. or it could be that some of her comments (especially regarding child molesters) broke her contract. Bear in mind practically any large company will potentially fire someone for actively getting involved in political or sensitive conversation that could alienate a certain branch of consumers.

This could turn out well for her. Microsoft may hire her as a dancer for their developers conferences now.