Forums - Politics Discussion - Russian soldier wipes out ISIS thugs by calling airstrike on HIMSELF

Botomud said:
hershel_layton said:

Uhh...that can be percieved as kill that "ISIS piece of shit", or "Kill those Muslims that are scum".

 

Honestly, that's quite sickening. Being happy that any Muslim died? Know that most Muslims have become as peaceful as Christians(don't state Taqiyya. Not all of them lie). As with any group of people, there will be extremists for obvious reasons. I mean, really. Why do people act so surprised when they hear about Muslim terrorists? There's 1.5 billion muslims. Of course there will be some rotten apples in the basket!


Of course im happy,, that is the sole reason why I follow the news now to see how many die each day as part of a war or some suicide attack. The less there are in the world the  safer we are.

Pretty much all muslims are scum so....

Funny how pretty much all the trouble in the world is from the muslim extremists. When was the last time there was a terrorist attack and it was a buddist extremist? It's always muslims and always will be muslims, they are not like proper people.

Alt removed -RavenXtra

LOL Do you not look into the deep web? There are extreme buddhists who will kill people for possession of beef. 

 

How disgusting. I hope you stay banned permanently. Wishing death upon an entire group is nothing but an abomination



 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12/22/2016- Made a bet with Ganoncrotch that the first 6 months of 2017 will be worse than 2016. A poll will be made to determine the winner. Loser has to take a picture of them imitating their profile picture.

Around the Network

He was dead anyway, but it's still very heroic of him. :o



Bet with Teeqoz for 2 weeks of avatar and sig control that Super Mario Odyssey would ship more than 7m on its first 2 months. The game shipped 9.07m, so I won

fatslob-:O said:
Why was this a one man mission ?

It is not uncommon for 1 or 2 man missions, they act as spotters for artillary and air strikes. They usually don't intend to directly engage with the enemy themselves, they just paint the targets for others, less people equals less chance of being caught and taking 5, 10 or 20 would actually decrease your chance of survival as more chance of being spotted.

It sounds like he was screwed anyway he went, but definitely a brave act. Russia seems to be the only country that have actually made a difference in the fight (even if many of their reasons to help are selfish).



nanarchy said:

It is not uncommon for 1 or 2 man missions, they act as spotters for artillary and air strikes. They usually don't intend to directly engage with the enemy themselves, they just paint the targets for others, less people equals less chance of being caught and taking 5, 10 or 20 would actually decrease your chance of survival as more chance of being spotted.

Don't modern militaries usually have backup plans ? 



nanarchy said:
fatslob-:O said:
Why was this a one man mission ?

It is not uncommon for 1 or 2 man missions, they act as spotters for artillary and air strikes. They usually don't intend to directly engage with the enemy themselves, they just paint the targets for others, less people equals less chance of being caught and taking 5, 10 or 20 would actually decrease your chance of survival as more chance of being spotted.

It sounds like he was screwed anyway he went, but definitely a brave act. Russia seems to be the only country that have actually made a difference in the fight (even if many of their reasons to help are selfish).

The only thing is, Russia is not fighting ISIS but the rebels. Just this week, US wiped some high ranking ISIS officials in Syria, leaving the ground soldiers with their d*ck in their hands. Russia is fighting the rebels off Assad's back.



Around the Network
fatslob-:O said:
nanarchy said:

It is not uncommon for 1 or 2 man missions, they act as spotters for artillary and air strikes. They usually don't intend to directly engage with the enemy themselves, they just paint the targets for others, less people equals less chance of being caught and taking 5, 10 or 20 would actually decrease your chance of survival as more chance of being spotted.

Don't modern militaries usually have backup plans ? 

of course. But you can't have a backup plan that will work for every possible scenario. If you are unexpectedly surrounded nothing is going to save you as nothing but fast moving jets can get their in time.



fatslob-:O said:
nanarchy said:

It is not uncommon for 1 or 2 man missions, they act as spotters for artillary and air strikes. They usually don't intend to directly engage with the enemy themselves, they just paint the targets for others, less people equals less chance of being caught and taking 5, 10 or 20 would actually decrease your chance of survival as more chance of being spotted.

Don't modern militaries usually have backup plans ? 

It sounds like a mission gone bad.



Goatseye said:
nanarchy said:

It is not uncommon for 1 or 2 man missions, they act as spotters for artillary and air strikes. They usually don't intend to directly engage with the enemy themselves, they just paint the targets for others, less people equals less chance of being caught and taking 5, 10 or 20 would actually decrease your chance of survival as more chance of being spotted.

It sounds like he was screwed anyway he went, but definitely a brave act. Russia seems to be the only country that have actually made a difference in the fight (even if many of their reasons to help are selfish).

The only thing is, Russia is not fighting ISIS but the rebels. Just this week, US wiped some high ranking ISIS officials in Syria, leaving the ground soldiers with their d*ck in their hands. Russia is fighting the rebels off Assad's back.

ISIS and Al-Assad suck. It's all because of Al-Assad that the revolution and chaos all occurred.

 



 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12/22/2016- Made a bet with Ganoncrotch that the first 6 months of 2017 will be worse than 2016. A poll will be made to determine the winner. Loser has to take a picture of them imitating their profile picture.

Wright said:

I wonder what were his final thoughts.

"Well, I'm dead either way. Might as well troll them by having all of us be killed"



 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12/22/2016- Made a bet with Ganoncrotch that the first 6 months of 2017 will be worse than 2016. A poll will be made to determine the winner. Loser has to take a picture of them imitating their profile picture.

nanarchy said:
fatslob-:O said:

Don't modern militaries usually have backup plans ? 

of course. But you can't have a backup plan that will work for every possible scenario. If you are unexpectedly surrounded nothing is going to save you as nothing but fast moving jets can get their in time.

Or deploy drones to have eyes on the sky for the troops or platoon.