What? That's a badly reviewed game...? It's one of the better ones. The only reason I could see if reviewing poorly is for a dumb reason: being too hard.

And that's exactly it. Gamespot 6/10 - too hard. One reviewer gave it a 4/10 for not being Final Fantasy.

On top of my mind: Alone in the Dark 5 (or just Alone in the Dark). It was a rough game, full of bugs, glitches and plotholes. Yet it had some strange charm. I loved the exploration and the inventive fire-mechanic.

Oh, I thought that the GS "it's hard" bullshit started this gen xDDDDD

Sonic and the Black Knight. I had a lot of fun with this game.

I thought so. So disappointing u_u And that other review is just stupid...

Did Gamespot also review Conquest lower because it was too hard?

Dont want to twist your topic bro, but i think it would be better for the sake of the discussion that the bad reviewed game that we loved, we have played it as an adult.

As a kid, you could have given me Superman 64 and i would had a blast playing that piece of shit!

Of course. The reviewer started to play the game on Classic mode and he had to re-start the game again. He must have acknowledged that the game is suposed to be hard.

Haha, if he really did, then the reviewer would know restarting is also part of FE territory, haha... Didn't they see there is a mode just for them? Casual and Phoenix mode... xD

AEGRO said: Dont want to twist your topic bro, but i think it would be better for the sake of the discussion that the bad reviewed game that we loved, we have played it as an adult. As a kid, you could have given me Superman 64 and i would had a blast playing that piece of shit!

Hell as a kid i played tons of games i thought were great back then, but now what be laughed at, my first console was a Atari ST and though it had bomb jack, double dragon and outrun i still liked ghostbusters which i remember most kids hated.