Most of you aren't aware of this but I strongly believe that your penchant belief in liberalism will lead to two inevitable future outcomes:

Man-child sexual relationships will become normalized. This has long been a sub-goal of the gay rights movement though not commonly acknowledged. These can be seen as clandestine parallel interests. It's better for you liberals to focus on gay marriage since it has popular traction in the present.

Polyamory replacing what is left of the nuclear family. That's right, some other dude will fuck your girlfriend and you will be totally okay with that. Forgive the crudeness of my language but I'm not okay with it hence why I will root for Trump to reverse or at least slow down these developments.

User moderated -RavenXtra

What in the fucking hell???? Is this some kind of joke? Or an ironic comment? I'm bad at irony :P

There is a huge difference between killing civilians in friendly fire, even including deliberatly risking civilian casualties in a bombing campaign, and aiming civilians on purpose like Trump was willing to go by his statement. Unlike the first two, the latter would be a clear breach of the Geneva Conventions, so either the US would have to opt out of them first or get booted out after such attacks happened. Either way, there would be absolutely massive worldwide uproar against this practice. Also, deliberatly killing civilians will only fuel the ranks of extremists and terrorists with tons of new recruits in search for payback, thus achieving the exact opposite of what he wants to realise with this.

Its best just to ignore what reggin_bolas says.  He lives in the UK and doesn't even know what socialism is he thinks that Obama is socialist which is nowhere near being true.

HAHAHA. No, that's obviously not close to the truth. I think "socialism" is used for the righties as a term to design EVERYTHING about """left""" (in which I wouldn't include Obama). 

EDIT: I've just seen the post above, I'll try to remain calm, I promise ;)

Snowden is a hero, right now there is no American that is better than him, he should run for president and make an end to the illegal activities of the NSA, CIA and all the other dirty things the US do.

Can you define Man-child sexual relationships for me.  When I think of the term Man-child, I think of an adult that hasn't matured yet.

Its more then a bit much.  There are plenty of countries where gays and lesbians have more rights then in the US and none of them are close to normalizing or legalizing man child sexual relationships.  Also marriages might become a thing of the past eventually but that doesn't open the door for polyamory most people still perfer being monogamous and always will.

Hilary Clinton is legally not qualified to be president, unless you are allowed to run and be president while in jail. If you believe the email scandal is over blown you are wrong. What she did is illegal and any other government employee would already be in jail. Your mom or dad would be in jail if they did the same thing and saying the emails weren't classified at the time means nothing because that is the reason why you are not allowed to have a private server because their is no system to automatically classify emails. But of course Hilary could have been lying when she said that.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/inspector-general-clinton-emails-had-intel-from-most-secretive-classified-programs.html

That is fox new but if you don't trust them you can just use your common sense. If Hilary Clinton was secretary of state and didn't think she was going to receive classified information she is a moron. If she in fact didn't receive classified information what was she doing was her job not important at all. But of course if you don't actually believe in equal justice under the law, if you think Hilary Clinton should get away with it just because she is more important. There is no help for you if you think Richard Nixon should have gone to jail because he was a Republican and not Hilary Clinton because she is a democrat. If you do not believe in equal justice under the law for everyone no matter who they are, we can not have a conversation me and you have nothing in common. (Yes that last part is hyperbole)

The first is ridiculous because there's a clear line in the sand of what's acceptable and what's not.  The key phrase is "consenting adults".  

The second would be fine if that's how society worked.  We'd all be used to it and wouldn't bat an eye.  I'm the jealous type, but I'd assume if I grew up in a culture where polyamory was the norm I'd be much less likely to be jealous.