SF V + Super SF V + Ultra SF V + Definitive Super Ultra Mega SF V Arcade Championship Editon. Capcom wins.

I was more talking from sales though, how's tekken doing sales wise against the others? I guess I should have mentioned Mortal Kombat as well.

Based on this website, Tekken is the best selling fighting game series (I typed just tekken, street fighter and super smash bros into the search). Above both SF and Smash. Before SF4, that was lacking well behind. But Tekken had consistant sales while some SF games were very poor showings. Smash always does but there have been less iterations.

Street Fighter. Everywhere.

The first SFIV did well due to good timing of the release. No one expected a barebone game that people would get screwed over via SSFIV. There's a reason why Capcom couldn't match the success of SFIV with games like MVC 3 and SFXT. Capcom damage their reputation that no one outside the Capcom bubble would trust them anymore. Why do you think Capcom could even fund SFV themselves? 

Pokemon has a far bigger fanbase than SF.  Pokken Tournament is more casual friendly, won't have any shady DLC crap that SFV will have like the stupid DLC costumes that's being held back, and Pokken Tournament won't be barebones like SFV.

Street Fighter V easy.

MvC3 did really well for a MvC game, sold over 2.5 million. Spin offs never do as well as main series games. SFxTekken was generally not considered very good however, idea was nice but wasn't executed as well as it could have been.

Capcom could easily fund it themselves, in reality, but they seem to be getting help from Sony, for whatever reason that might be (remember the game is being released on PC too). It's one of their biggest franchises and they can't afford to make it sounds questionable considering they are currently in the process of making an unproven title in Umbrella Corps.

Pokemon is a bigger franchise, Pokken Tourmement isn't however a bigger fighting game that Street Fighter. We don't know if any shady DLC will come to pass as that might be the Capcom of the past. No one is denying both games will be big but one of them is Street Fighter, the other is a spin off.

It's pretty clear that if you don't think SFV will dominate everywhere, then you're either a Nintendo fanboy and/or a Pokemon fanboy that isn't thinking realistically. See how dumb that sounds?

You must not have been in tune with the appeal SFV has ganered with the beta alone. It's already super successful and it's conjured quite the following. No one has taken a blind eye to Capcom's shady business practices in the past. However, I will say this. The DLC to SFIV is mostly what the FANS wanted. Capcom delivered. Most of the characters that's been requested has gotten on the game. The prices for THAT DLC was jutisfied. I can't speak on the character costumes and such. So the Street Fighter X Tekken game is a good game. The DLC practice was horrid. It's a commercial failure and understandbly so. Still I find it to be a good game. Marvel VS Capcom 3 was f'ed up due to the fact that they released another version 9 months. UMVC 3 is a popular hit. It's not a bad game at all.

I understand your disgruntlement with Capcom, but remember Street Fighter is THEE most popular fighting game in history. To generalize the gamers on this site as Capcom/Sony fanboys because they believe SFV would beat Pokken sales wise is ignorant at best. Pokken is an unproven fighting game that didn't take too well in the Japanese arcades. As I said before, SFV is already widely popular amongst the fighting game community.  Opinions at the end of the day though.

Street Fighter has the advantage of being a proven fighting game compared to Pokken Fighters. Also, I'm not sure why they chose the name Pokken Fighters. I know it's a mix of Pokemon and Tekken, but wouldn't it be better for marketing a name like Pokemon Fighters?

Pokemon is 'pocket monsters'? Tekken is 'Iron Fist'. Pokken = 'Pocket Fist'.... ?