By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - The weird rubbing face mini-game of Fire Emblem Fates will be consored in the West.

 

What do you think about this censorship ?

THANKS GOD 14 16.87%
 
That's okay, I don't give a shit anyway 20 24.10%
 
Curse you, Nintendo !! 31 37.35%
 
Gamergate ruins everything 16 19.28%
 
Pet ? Pot ? Pat ? 2 2.41%
 
Total:83
Ka-pi96 said:
Wright said:

 


This post is ****** ********, you ********* ****.

Oh Wright you ****sucking **** faced ****** *******!

 

Wait a second, why is my post censored? Did the Spanish Government silenced it?!



Around the Network
binary solo said:
This is NOT censorship. Stop using the word to try to inflame people's sensibilities. Censorship is when an external party (usually a government) legally prevents you from releasing your product unless you remove content.

All these recent claims of censorship is simply Japanese gaming companies wanting to maintain a certain image in the west. Which means they are either embarassed (most likely the reason in this case) or afraid of getting negative PR for racist, sexists or other culturally inappropriate content. Because it certainly has nothing to do with what gamers will buy and nothing to do with government interference.

 

Actually it is censorship.  Nintendo has decided that the game will not be released in the US without this feature removed.  Therefore Nintendo is censoring the game.



RolStoppable said:

I have dozens of pictures at my disposal. If I weren't lazy, I would have hundreds.

You mean to say you have a special KP folder?.

Do you have one for Ron =o?





Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Chazore said:
RolStoppable said:
 

I have dozens of pictures at my disposal. If I weren't lazy, I would have hundreds.

You mean to say you have a special KP folder?.

Do you have one for Ron =o?

 

Why not ask if he has one folder of them...together...?





Ka-pi96 said:
binary solo said:
This is NOT censorship. Stop using the word to try to inflame people's sensibilities. Censorship is when an external party (usually a government) legally prevents you from releasing your product unless you remove content.

It is censorship. It doesn't have to be done by an external party.

Example: You ****

That was censored. Wasn't do by any external party or government though.

Nope, that's not censorship. That's moderation. Self censorship is a colloquialism and popular misappropriation of the word. 

If you want to argue that Nintendo the publisher is an external party relative to the people who developed the game, then there is a case to be made of censorship. But first you have to prove that the people who developed the game itself did not choose to remove that content.





“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Around the Network

Stuff like this just makes me think that Nintendo thinks very little of western people because they have to put on the kiddy gloves and shelter us from specific content constantly like we're too stupid to differentiate between fantasy and reality. All because a bunch of pearl-clutching virtue signalers who probably don't even play video games needed something to be offended by.



wombat123 said:
Stuff like this just makes me think that Nintendo thinks very little of western people because they have to put on the kiddy gloves and shelter us from specific content constantly like we're too stupid to differentiate between fantasy and reality. All because a bunch of pearl-clutching virtue signalers who probably don't even play video games needed something to be offended by.

 


Actually it's more that you have to blame the overly sensitive groups in the west who for years have complained about this and that, why do think games like DOAX aren even getting western releases and SFV getting censored despite being only a beta.



Edwardooo said:
Wright said:
Edwardooo said:

That could be one of the few times when a censorship actually makes the game better.

 

Why? Even the Nintendo rep said that the original japanese minigame was harmless.

 

This is dumb, really. It doesn't make the game better, it makes the game different, for better or worse. And I'm going to go with worse in this case.


'cause, huh, that has nothing to do in a mainline Fire Emblem game. If it was in a spin-off (or in SMTxFE), I wouldn't care, but this weird mini-game is like a dirt in the perfect suit that represents Fire Emblem Fates.

my thoughts exactly

 





Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda!!!!


Wyrdness said:
wombat123 said:
Stuff like this just makes me think that Nintendo thinks very little of western people because they have to put on the kiddy gloves and shelter us from specific content constantly like we're too stupid to differentiate between fantasy and reality. All because a bunch of pearl-clutching virtue signalers who probably don't even play video games needed something to be offended by.

 


Actually it's more that you have to blame the overly sensitive groups in the west who for years have complained about this and that, why do think games like DOAX aren even getting western releases and SFV getting censored despite being only a beta.

well I honestly the group that complained in previous years (religious and parents) are much different than the group complaining now (SJWs): The new ones can use social media.





Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda!!!!


Wright said:

Why not ask if he has one folder of them...together...?

We know they are an item already =P.





Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.