I think he means that people aren't concerned about bad practices when it doesn't "affect" them.

How is buying exclusivity a bad practice? It makes business sense. And truly, it's not worth caring about.

If not haveing street fighter bugs you that much,... buy a PS4?

Im not debateing right or wrong, above im Just saying things as they are

(thought honestly I believe Street fighter is very differnt situation than Rise of the Tomb Raider)

Its only going to get worse as the gen goes on. PS4 has so many games you ll never see on the Xbox One.

It's unfortunate, but in the end it's money that dictates these things. I don't necessarily like it, but I can understand SFV being console exclusive to the PS4. It has the largest market share by a significant margin, and in Japan the Xbox One has been stuck in the first screen since release, so I can see Capcom coming to the conclusion that an Xbox version would be a waste of time and money. In addition, fighting games have historically sold better on Sony's consoles.

Like I said, I don't necessarily like it, but I do understand why.

and they didnt have the money to make the game.....

Sony is the reason your getting this game in 2016, instead of 2019 or 20.

Rise of the Tomb Raider was getting made reguardless, and was supposed to originally be multi plat.

Very differnt situations, that are constantly ignored by xbox fans.

Could be, though that's not the reason why they're aggressive.

I think the agressive part is because people will defend anything to "protect" their company of choice no matter what they did. Some will also assume that if you are agains't some practices it automatically means that you don't like said console/company... 

I don't think he was targeting SFV specifically. It was more of an example. One good example would be people defending always online console to play any games even the offline ones. Because they had good internet meant that it was a non issue forgeting that this could prevent other gamers to enjoy the hobby.

Nope. I don't own a PS4 and I'm glad that Sony was smart enough to work out that exclusive. Same with Tomb Raider on XBO, which I also don't own. Those were great gets from both. Exclusives are what make consoles unique. If you want the game, buy the system. If you can't, sucks for you. Get over it.

the best way to support your console is to make games for it. lol. its a dying art, i know.

It bugs you because you don't seem to understand how business works and where all that money they get has to go.  Overhead for a company is a lot more than people typically give credit for.  Any long term project (like SF, which I can assure you takes them a lot longer than you seem to think to get together properly) means paying out money while taking none in.  Until the game hits shelves they aren't making any profit from that project.  They are paying the devs, keeping the lights on, working on other projects, and doing other things, all with money they have made off previous projects that are no longer bringing in the kind of revenue they did at launch.

Also, just because a company has the total amount needed to complete a project in the bank doesn't mean it is all allocated to the project.  They have to look at how much they anticipate the game making, and then determine how much they are willing to spend.  All of this while, again, not making any money on the project.