Of course not because men aren't allowed to point out that gender equality favours women.

I can't make it through this whole list... nor should I have to. Did someone just go through a separation? I'm not sure where this need to distinguish differences between the sexes, let alone maintain a misogynic tone throughout came from.

If you did indeed break up with someone recently, might I suggest a bottle of whiskey and a friend.

Most of these are privileges not rights that is true. There is no actual right that a man has that a woman doesn't (in the west) but women do have rights that men don't and that is the point. Here they are

1. Women have the right to genital integrity

2. Women have the right to vote without agreeing to die (or conscriptional immunity, e.g. Austria, Finland, Greece, Switzerland)

3. Women have the right to choose parenthood

4. Women have the right to be assumed (competent) caregivers for children

5. Women have the right to call unwanted, coerced sex rape

However, there are at least 7 more legal rights women have, that men don't (varying by Western country):

1. Women have the right to lower jail sentences for the same crime US, Australia, UK

2. Women have the right to not be assumed sexual predators British Airways, Qantas, Air New Zealand, Virgin Australia

3. Women have the right to government departments that solely serve their interests Office on Violence Against Women - US, Ministry for Women - New Zealand, Office for Women - Australia

4. Women have the right to government-enforced gender quotas Leadership positions in publicly traded companies - Norway, Legislated quotas in national parliaments - Belgium, France, Greece, Ireland, Spain, Portugal

5. Women have the right to exclusive tax benefits for being a business owner US, Australia

6. Women have the right to domestic violence shelters US, Canada, Europe

7. Women have the right to not be assumed the primary agressor in a domestic dispute US, UK

This ain't my list.

You took the time to put it up here and you won't stand up for it?  Really?  What is the purpose?

The purpose is to prove that men are the main victims of gender inequality.

If women got paid less for the same job, market logic would dictate that only women would be hired.

This is the central feminist argument scientifically debunked in one small sentence, with common sense alone. You don't need more than a bit of logic to prove ANY feminist wrong. Lists in the OP are actually counter-productive because they give more food for feminist thought and more reason for them to spew their shit.

Your case would sound better if you did a more comprehensive examination instead of regurgitating a bias list, but, good luck.

Women earn less because they choose to work less hours in lower paid and safer professions. When was the last time you saw a woman a 1000 feet in the air constructing a skyscraper.

This is vgchartz not the new york times. I detect a mangina here.