nah they're making way more money due to these videos being available for potential customers to watch.

AngryJoe has like what.. 2-3m views per review?
If only 1% of that can be convinced to buy a game, they'll get more profits than AngryJoe with that 1 video.

No one should Nintendo's example honestly, especially in this regard.

Those Payday 2 devs are also learning that hard lesson and also the same for the likes of Cliffy B.

This guy has to be doing a Rol lol. I mean nobody can possibly be that st........nvm hehe.

Now, that alternative income streams for youtubers, like patreon are cropping up, I very much doubt that that would prove successfull for any of the publishers or youtube.
People would likely migrate away from youtube because the one big plus (besides platform recognition) they have on youtube would fall by the wayside, They woud not be generating money over it anymore. No reason to use it really, if they can't generate money with it, they might a well use vimeo or something.
Depending on the size of their audience they will make much more revenue from alternative souces, and their fanbase is probably more than willing to throw money at them. Basically, if a channel is big enough to live off youtube, it will be big enough to live off patreon.
Streamers are about personalities more, than they are about the game they stream. Yes, there might be a relevant time windows, to stream certain games, but in general as long as the streamer is providing some kind of quality output, the audience won't really give a shit what they are playing anymore.
The big looser in scenario would obvoiusly be youtube itself. Publishers, while not making any money off it would probably still have enough games streamed (on other video providers and twitch) for them to work as advertisements, despite the bad press over their money grab move. But youtube would suffer.

Is this a joke thread? Has to be.

I can't tell if you love Nintendo but hate this practice and want it justified by hoping the others follow in, or you just simply hate Sony and Microsoft.

and don't forget the people who hate angry joe who would buy the game just because he rants about it.

Sony and Microsoft don't really need to do this, as games isn't there only or main source of money..

Sony goes all out on the Music side, but I don't see why they need to for video games.. this would just give them a negative light, like in Nintendo's case

Is this a joke?

And btw the objective of those youtube poilicies is not getting more money, is having control about its content, they are to blame for being too conservative, not too greedy.