SP games don't sell a ton huh? Look at Fallout 4. I'm one of the people whom only play games for the SP campaign, even COD. I just get so damn bored with multiplayer, i don't even bother with it anymore. You can't tell me that games like Titanfall wouldn't have sold better if it had a campaign mode, and that atleast half of the people whom buy Halo, never play the MP.

Well said sir.  

I'm having fun with Battlefront, and I tend to hate multiplayer-centric titles. Oddly, the disjointed single player mission structure works well for me in this case, purely because the dev doesn't have to worry about making the game fit canonically; it's a series of situations that could theoretically happen in the Star Wars universe, without a flimsy plot trying to tie it all together.

Honestly, my biggest issue with the game is that you can't play all of the game modes with bots.

It shouldn't be that difficult to do and it adds a lot of longevity to the game.

Maybe next year we will get "The Taken Jedi" that gets 90+ on meta :).

Hahaha, that's a good one.

I look at Fallout 4 and then I also look at the myriad of online games that are still as popular as ever and still make loads of money just as you will no doubt claim for SP only titles, the thing is here is that I like and accept both, you don't and have voiced multiple times of how much you hate MP and prefer SP to a point where you'd love a game be entirely changed to suit your preference over what would actually be good for a game.

The end line is that BF 1-2's campaign mode was basically conquest with a cinematic before and after and some slight voice over work, the objectives were still within the realm of the gameplay that is still largely unchanged today. YOur desire for an SP campaign would mean playing the same exact conquest mode but with very slight changes made to which the end result doesn't really paint it as a proper story SP campaign.

Titanfall from the start was pitched as an MP game and that's exactly what it is, the campaign and general story mode for the universe of TF was very mediocre so making it SP only or putting way more focus on SP would have left the game being incredibly mediocre and then of course the MP would be in shambles, that's what I can tell you though.

Halo's MP is what it is though and it's been just as popular if not more than the story and brought innovations to the table.

Bat Battlefront II comparison pic is all you needed to know to figure out this game was going to be nothing but a let down. It's playable, fun even, but down right pathetic in terms of lack of / downgraded content.

Single player modes for fps competitive games are pretty much dying. People usually just play the multiplayer and skip over the single player.

agreed. I am at 30 hours played and am loving it. I have played maybe 160 matches or so, and each one plays out differently. One match a tactic I used to go 34-7 K/D flat out does not work against a differnt team.

The modes I play, maybe 50% Walker assualt, 30% Supremecy, 10% Blast, and 10% all others. I will say the droid mode is very fun, but will wait until I play with my brothers online for that, commincation would give a major advantage in that mode.

As for content, well like I said 30 hours in. 30 hours is my minimum for a full priced game unless the lesser time is truly specacular. I cant wait to play more tomorrow, so even if I burn out over the next 10 hours this game is a success to me.

Also, the development process is deeper than people give it credit for. At level 30, I feel I have a sizable advantage over a new player.