CaptainExplosion said:
|
Because it dropped in price quickly. When the PS3 was $600.00, it was getting murdered.
Do you think Patcher is right? | |||
Yes, other price would be a wrong move. | 94 | 28.75% | |
No, it will be more expensive. | 79 | 24.16% | |
No, it will be cheaper. | 30 | 9.17% | |
No, because Patcher said it. | 100 | 30.58% | |
Is this a NX thread? The ... | 24 | 7.34% | |
Total: | 327 |
CaptainExplosion said:
|
Because it dropped in price quickly. When the PS3 was $600.00, it was getting murdered.
AlfredoTurkey said: Imo, Nintendo needs to go back to the whole UNDER $300.00 model of business. They should take a loss on hardware this time in order to gain marketshare and respect and try to recoup through killer software. A $199.99 price point on a console with at least PS4 power (it's possible that a console like that wouldn't even CAUSE a loss considering the PS4 will be three years old next year) and great games would do very well imo. |
I don't think that would be very likely.
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
AZWification said:
I don't think that would be very likely. |
Neither do I lol.
I guess it all depends on how Nintendo is going to handle the whole Fusion thing, will it be ONE single unit or two of them? $299 is a pretty safe bet but the question is if it will be able to compete against PS4 and X1, or if Nintendo is aiming for a disruptive device.
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
CaptainExplosion said:
I was hoping that it would be $200 instead, so that we'd get more bang for our buck, like with the N64 back then. |
Hmm, I doubt it would be priced that low, but you have to keep track of inflation because $200 then is not $200 now..
NintenDomination [May 2015 - July 2017]
- Official VGChartz Tutorial Thread -
NintenDomination [2015/05/19 - 2017/07/02]
Here lies the hidden threads.
| |
Nintendo Metascore | Official NintenDomination | VGC Tutorial Thread
| Best and Worst of Miiverse | Manga Discussion Thead |
[3DS] Winter Playtimes [Wii U]
AlfredoTurkey said:
Inflation doesn't matter to the consumer. People don't look at a sticker price and go "Well, it's X amount of dollars, but... given inflation bla bla bla." That's not now it works. People assign STICKER PRICES to certain things and don't budge from it. Game consoles will never sell well if they go beyond a certain price point, inflation or not. |
Never is a rather long time. Standards change with inflation. The New York Times costed a penny a hundred years ago and now it is 250 times more expensive. A few thousand dollars were a reasonable fortune and could buy you a home. Just grab a supermarket leaflet from 10, 15 years ago and see how your own standards changed a little, even if subconsciously.
Or look here - http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2011/05/05/10-everyday-grocery-items/
There is absolutely zero evidence whatsoever to corroborate your theory. And in fact, your smug tone makes it rather pleasurable to point out how you post stuff that works only in your imagination.
It will be cheaper than that.
Official member of VGC's Nintendo family, approved by the one and only RolStoppable. I feel honored.
First time that I agree on Pachter, NX home console will be $249-299.
JRPGfan said:
Im not intrested in a tablet version of a wii u. |
Well Nintendo dont need money from poor hardcore gamer Lol. Well seriously, hardcore gamer is the last concern for them, they dont have a large fanbase anymore like PS and Xbox, most of them are secondary user or people that really have a nostalgic feeling and grew up with Nintendo. What they need is to atract casual or more of less non dedicated gamer.