Yes, Zelda TP HD in March and Zelda U in November, after all it's 30th Zelda anniversary. This year we had something similar for 3DS, MM 3D in February and Tri Force Heroes in October.

How did you get hold of this screenshot? I don't remember see this scene in the direct.

Because it wasn´t, Nintendo released screenshots after the direct that were not in the trailer.

Goodnightmoon said: captain carot said: You can clearly see that meshes weren't touched. All has the same low polygon count as it had nine years ago. Some FX just look cheap compared to PS360 games. There's the high res textures though. That's Dolphin: There's even versions with improved shader effects. That emulation is running on a much powerfull hardware than a WiiU though, and the standar emulation without all the super HD textures added and improved shadder effects doesn´t look better than the remaster.

Ha ha ha. So much contradiction that I cant even laugh properly. In one post, Wii U has uber graphics. In another Wii U isnt strong enough to put good graphics. This is just pathetic.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7612409

Contradiction? You said that Nintendo exclusives don´t look good. I showed you a lot of Nintendo exclusives that do look good.

What has that to do with the fact that the emulation is probably running on a PC that is probably way more powerfull than Ps4 itself? You cannot run that in a normal PC, so it´s only an option for some people with a good PC to run it properly looking like that.

I don´t know what you find hilarious there, but you are free to laugh.

It does look better. I think most people just assumed that it would get the same kind of graphical overhaul treatment that WW got. It's disappointing that they didn't at least try to smooth the models out more, instead of leaving everything polygon-wise as is. All they did was up the rez and provide better textures.

I might still get it, especially because it seems to (thankfully) be based on the GC version. But still, I will admit that when this was first rumored, I had hoped the graphic upgrade would have been at least a BIT more substantial.

Recently a certain fanbase of VGC makes me laugh a lot.

"Thread A: Company X doesnt need third party?

Thread B: Will you play Black OPS 3 if it comes in this console?"

"Thread A: X console is very powerful.

Thread B: Why on earth they put weak hardware in this system?"

As for the games you mentioned they look like 7th gen game with added lightning (off course at 720p) and without any anti alising. I am outta here. Being blind is too much among some individuals.

You said, this isn't remake, its HD port.

People need to realise that original game looks horrible, WW looks miles better, and in remaster TP couldnt look great like WW HD because of art style, for something like that TP would need full remake, not simple remaster.

Saying that, I agree that TP HD looks considerably better than the original, but because art style WW HD looks great event for today standards (actually I think it's one of the best looking game this gen), that isn't case for TP HD.

That moment people realize Skyward Sword would have been a much better choice to make an HD version of.

If you played the Gamecube version on CRT, SD TV, it looked great. The reason people think games of that era looked like ass is because they're now plugging in those consoles to HDTVs... that's the mistake. This newer version doesn't really look much better than the original on an SD, CRT. It just looks better than the original played on an HDTV.