By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - It looks like Fallout 4 will be another Skyrim on ps platforms.

Tagged games:

Aeolus451 on 08 November 2015

bethesda really needs to just delay the game and fix the bugs it has on all platforms. Otherwise, I won't touch it at all or until a year after it's been "kinda" patched.



Around the Network
LurkerJ on 08 November 2015
LudicrousSpeed said:
OttoniBastos said:
A game made by bethesda,in the gamebryo engine runs like shit and/or is full of bugs....

Did people expect anything better than this?

Except it doesn't run like shit or isn't full of bugs.

Or, if so, that's PS4 exclusive. Because I have seen the PC version and have played the Xbone version for 14 hours or so. Per usual, the hyperbole is strong when it comes to mindless shitting on Bethesda titles.

Excuse us if Bethesda made it this easy for us to believe that another game of theirs is broken. I hope the case is different for Fallout 4 and that the OP is wrong. Nevertheless, It doesn't erase the bad taste buggy Fallout 3 & Skyrim ,PC version with patches, left me with. 



Aeolus451 on 08 November 2015
LudicrousSpeed said:
OttoniBastos said:
A game made by bethesda,in the gamebryo engine runs like shit and/or is full of bugs....

Did people expect anything better than this?

Except it doesn't run like shit or isn't full of bugs.

Or, if so, that's PS4 exclusive. Because I have seen the PC version and have played the Xbone version for 14 hours or so. Per usual, the hyperbole is strong when it comes to mindless shitting on Bethesda titles.

A more likely scenario is the game runs well on all platforms. No reason why my Xbone version would run fine and the more powerful PS4 version not so much.


Right when I read the bolded part, I knew that you were lying your ass off. It's not mindless shitting when it's completely justified. If anything Bethesda's games don't catch enough flak for being as buggy as they are. 



jason1637 on 08 November 2015
Random_Matt said:
vivster said:
Shocker! But why care about performance? I play games, not frames per seconds.


Below 30 FPS is unplayable.


Thats how fallout an elder scroll games are meant to be playe don consoles with glitches and bad frame rare.



OttoniBastos on 08 November 2015

.

Last edited by OttoniBastos - on 08 April 2019

Around the Network
Wagram on 08 November 2015
LudicrousSpeed said:

Except it doesn't run like shit or isn't full of bugs.

Or, if so, that's PS4 exclusive. Because I have seen the PC version and have played the Xbone version for 14 hours or so. Per usual, the hyperbole is strong when it comes to mindless shitting on Bethesda titles.

A more likely scenario is the game runs well on all platforms. No reason why my Xbone version would run fine and the more powerful PS4 version not so much.

I nominate this post for most laughable of the year.



Insidb on 08 November 2015
LudicrousSpeed said:
Nogamez said:
So what is it any good on xbox? Or both versions nada


I have 14 hours on the Xbone version and have had no game breaking bugs, no frame rate issues, and only a small glitch.

Maybe this guy is full of shit or had a patch of bad luck.

This: I watched both videos, waiting for (apparently) nothing to happen.



LudicrousSpeed on 08 November 2015
OttoniBastos said:
Aeolus451 said:


Right when I read the bolded part, I knew that you were lying your ass off. It's not mindless shitting when it's completely justified. If anything Bethesda's games don't catch enough flak for being as buggy as they are. 

Fucking this!

For way less problems than we get from Bethesda,we would be crucifying EA,Ubisoft,sony,microsoft,capcom,etc...

When it comes to Bethesda games,people selectively lower their standard to a point where anything is acceptable because "no one does games as open as bethesda".

Doesn't matter if the game looks and runs like shit,doesn't matter if the game is broken and barely playable in the first 6 months,doesn't matter if the only redeemable factor of their games is how mod-friendly they are and eventually "fans will fix everything".

If you think about it,people basically pay $60 for a rpg maker where they wait for a better fan-made content.

And GOD forbid if someone point that out 'cause "you're bullying the poor bethesda.".

LOL theres some more of that high quality hyperbole.



outlawauron on 08 November 2015
Random_Matt said:
vivster said:
Shocker! But why care about performance? I play games, not frames per seconds.


Below 30 FPS is unplayable.

This truly is the generation of hyperbole.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Arkaign on 08 November 2015

Going by PC history, Bethesda's engines have been very reliant on high IPC since Morrowind. At the same time, they are very poorly optimized for multicore. A sandy-bridge dual-core i3 is faster at Skyrim/Fallout 3/NV than a hex-core Phenom II.

On the console side of things, the Cell was a bitch to optimize for, while the IBM CPU in the 360 was a better match for their engines.

So my guess is that the low-IPC CPU side of the PS4/X1 is just weak on this engine unless they really get it retweaked/rebuilt enough to balance on more cores. The CPU side of Jaguar is LITERALLY an 8-core netbook level processor. The IPC is horrendous, so for things to work well, the multithreading has to be really on point.

If the CPU and not the GPU is the problem, and I'm pretty confident in that guess, then the X1 should enjoy a slight advantage by having the same processor power, but at 1.75ghz instead of 1.6ghz. So in all probability, we will see very similar, but slightly better performance from X1 in this title. That is, if the slower system memory doesn't end up negating some of that (which should be neglible).