By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - The Halo 5: Guardians Metacritic/review thread - Currently at 84 Meta

Tagged games:

Some people are saying the campaign is a little short, but I can't see it being short compare to most FPS this gen. Hell, some fps don't even have a campaign. I hope some sites will give it a 10/10 just to protect them from the click bait sites.



Around the Network
walsufnir said:
dovus said:
Will meta on 86 hurt game's sales?


Looking at Destiny's scores, I doubt it.


This, destiny is so boring it is unbelieveable. 



Snoopy said:

Some people are saying the campaign is a little short, but I can't see it being short compare to most FPS this gen. Hell, some fps don't even have a campaign. I hope some sites will give it a 10/10 just to protect them from the click bait sites.


You want some reviewers to just hand out 10/10s to make up for reviews you have deemed clickbait?

None of the scores so far have been ridiculously low. Getting a 7/10 review for a game in the mid 80s is normal.



dovus said:
Will meta on 86 hurt game's sales?

I don't think so. If it was really low maybe, but the general public won't know or care and the dedicated fans will get it regardless 



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

BraLoD said:
Snoopy said:

Some people are saying the campaign is a little short, but I can't see it being short compare to most FPS this gen. Hell, some fps don't even have a campaign. I hope some sites will give it a 10/10 just to protect them from the click bait sites.


So you want sites to start giving it higher scores because you don't like others giving it lower scores.

If a reviewer is giving a score to protect a game, he is clearly biased, and shouldn't even be a reviewer... but if it suits your case than that's fine, just not if it's against it, huh.

Oh boy.


I never said a 10/10 that is undeserved, I just want 10/10 scores period to protect from the inevitable "Shit, I need some money for rent today or I am forced out of my apartment, better give this game a 2/10 to get some cheap views" 



Around the Network
Snoopy said:
Some people are saying the campaign is a little short, but I can't see it being short compare to most FPS this gen. Hell, some fps don't even have a campaign.

You're not wrong, but Halo is far better known for its SP than the majority of modern shooters. I'd never buy something like COD or BF for their story, but the SP is specifically why many (myself included) buy Halo. I doubt it'll have much of an impact on sales though. Short or not, the single player still seems good.



Destructoid -_-



Looks like MS weren't too honest about the length of the campaign. Looking at the reviews, it certainly isn't twice the length of Halo 4.



iTzCharlie said:
Destructoid -_-

I see nothing wrong with that review. A 7 seems like a fair enough score to me. People are entitled to their own opinion when they've actually played the game, you know! 



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

86 is a good score, I had hope it'll do better than Halo 4.