After checking the game a bit and being a huge fan of Four Sword Adventures, I can safely conclude that the best part of this one is that you can crossdress.
And while that sounds good, it doesn't speak well for the whole game, though...
After checking the game a bit and being a huge fan of Four Sword Adventures, I can safely conclude that the best part of this one is that you can crossdress.
And while that sounds good, it doesn't speak well for the whole game, though...
Wright said: After checking the game a bit and being a huge fan of Four Sword Adventures, I can safely conclude that the best part of this one is that you can crossdress. And while that sounds good, it doesn't speak well for the whole game, though... |
Most people liked the demo quite a bit, the game is more fun than it looks.
I thought the e3 trailer looked horrible. I didn't play Spirit Tracks because trains don't belong in a Zelda game and I won't play this either. I know many people here like anime, cell shading and think crossdressing in a Zelda game is cool but to me this is on the same level of ridiculousness as having a Lord of the Rings game in which you... well, do exactly what you do in Triforce Heroes. Zelda has alway been a "serious" IP to me. I don't like this and I don't like Metroid Prime: Federation Force. I'm sure these are great games, but why force them to be Zelda / Metroid games?
UncleScrooge said: I thought the e3 trailer looked horrible. I didn't play Spirit Tracks because trains don't belong in a Zelda game and I won't play this either. I know many people here like anime, cell shading and think crossdressing in a Zelda game is cool but to me this is on the same level of ridiculousness as having a Lord of the Rings game in which you... well, do exactly what you do in Triforce Heroes. Zelda has alway been a "serious" IP to me. I don't like this and I don't like Metroid Prime: Federation Force. I'm sure these are great games, but why force them to be Zelda / Metroid games? |
Your loss. Spirit tracks was one of the best handheld Zeldas to my mind (I know some disagree). And I've no idea why trains wouldn't fit a zelda game. It's not lord of the rings - it's a very diffrent universe. As to why this is a Zelda game... because the gameeplay is clearly that of a multiplayer Zelda game.
This game looks niche though and I don't think I have the free time to see if I might get into it. Coop gameplay isn't something I'm too fond of and it seems very dungeon foused with little or no overworld.
Is this game considered part of the main series or a spinoff?
Mati_Intrieri said: Is this game considered part of the main series or a spinoff? |
Spin-off of course
Mati_Intrieri said: Is this game considered part of the main series or a spinoff? |
Depends on the argument you are trying to do. For example:
- This game is a big flop from critics!
Answer: doesn't matter because it's a spin-off
- Aonuma must have developed a real sequel or a real mainline game
Answer: It's a mainline game. It has "The Legend of Zelda" in the title
Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever
Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe
Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor
Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile
Mati_Intrieri said: Is this game considered part of the main series or a spinoff? |
Err.... let's go with mainline, notwithstanding that it would have relased within a month or so of the Wii U game.
I'll still buy it but it looks a bit average to me. Come on Zelda U...please X(
Pavolink said:
- This game is a big flop from critics! Answer: doesn't matter because it's a spin-off
- Aonuma must have developed a real sequel or a real mainline game Answer: It's a mainline game. It has "The Legend of Zelda" in the title |
Hmm, I prefer to consider it a spinoff. Seriously, what the hell is this?
http://zeldauniverse.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Tri-Force-Heroes-Timeless-Tunic.png