By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Why are people happy with game exclusives but not movie exclusives??

Wright said:
mornelithe said:

A made-up, non-thing.  Is my best understanding of the situation.


The only "movie exclusive" thing I can think of is a movie not releasing on America/Europe/Japan for X reasons. And even those tend to finally cross frontiers, like Ex Machina, which took a while to release on America.

 

So yeah, I don't properly grasp OP's example here.

Aye, much of that is due to publishing issues, I believe.

This conversation however would more imply that X movie can only function on certain hardware, which is absolutely inaccurate.  Example simply doesn't fit.



Around the Network
spemanig said:
archer9234 said:
Because that doesn't actually happen. A movie is available on all devices somewhere, somehow. And we have more control of it ourselves. I can rip a DVD/BD to my iphone myself. I can't re code a game engine.


I mean technically, you could.

There is no reason you would. The likes of say Paramount or Disney, don't make disc players. They make movies/shows. There is no reason. Even if you want to argue stop phsyical media. They don't restrict their stuff to only one digital platform.



archer9234 said:

There is no reason you would. The likes of say Paramount or Disney, don't make disc players. They make movies/shows. There is no reason. Even if you want to argue stop phsyical media. They don't restrict their stuff to only one digital platform.


...That's not what I was saying at all. I was just making a joke saying you could just do the whole porting job yourself. Which is obviously absurd. Hence the joke.



archer9234 said:

There is no reason you would. The likes of say Paramount or Disney, don't make disc players. They make movies/shows. There is no reason. Even if you want to argue stop phsyical media. They don't restrict their stuff to only one digital platform.


...That's not what I was saying at all. I was just making a joke saying you could just do the whole porting job yourself. Which is obviously absurd. Hence the joke.



zero129 said:

 

What do you think it would take to get people on board with a 1 standed platform system?.

 

As long as it has fixed hardware that doesn't change or get a successor in less than 5 years



Around the Network
spemanig said:
archer9234 said:

There is no reason you would. The likes of say Paramount or Disney, don't make disc players. They make movies/shows. There is no reason. Even if you want to argue stop phsyical media. They don't restrict their stuff to only one digital platform.


...That's not what I was saying at all. I was just making a joke saying you could just do the whole porting job yourself. Which is obviously absurd. Hence the joke.

Really should mark posts as scarcasm. I usually will assume you really mean things seriously. Text never translates thoughts like that.



zero129 said:
mornelithe said:

A made-up, non-thing.  Is my best understanding of the situation.

The is no movie exclusives today but back when the HD-DVD vs BluRay war was going on some movies was exclusive to one platform or the other and before that the was the betamax vs vhs.

Would need to see actual lists showing which movies were exclusive to Beta and which to VHS, likewise with Blu Ray vs HD-DVD, you're also referring to a format war, which is much, much, much different than a console hardware war.  The format war has far wider economic implications.  And one invariably dies, and never comes back except as the butt of jokes.



spemanig said:
archer9234 said:
Because that doesn't actually happen. A movie is available on all devices somewhere, somehow. And we have more control of it ourselves. I can rip a DVD/BD to my iphone myself. I can't re code a game engine.


I mean technically, you could.


Not unless you had the assets, you don't have fill metal access to the engine to reprogram it for another console. Otherwise people would be doing this to exclusives to have them running on PC.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

zero129 said:
Zkuq said:
This question shows some extreme ignorance about technology.

If similar technological limitations existed for movies, people would complain. And conversely, if such technological limitations didn't exist with gaming, people would complain.

What limitions are they??. even now most engines work with multi systems making porting between X1-PS4-PC (Leaving out the wiiU) pretty easy as is.

If the was one standed platform id imagine this would be even easier.. Also at some point we are going to get to where everything is just powerful enough to run everything.

Porting is still a bit of work, which could mean a whole lot for smaller studios. As for bigger ones, they're already releasing games on most platforms unless they have exclusivity deals. And then there's custom engines, which obviously have issues with supporting multiple platforms because it's a lot more work.

No, we're never getting to the point where everything is powerful enough to run everything unless everything runs in the web or in the cloud. Computer architectures simply are so different from each other that whenever you have something that fully takes advantage of one platform, the other platforms aren't going to be able to emulate it properly.



PS3 had a lot of movie and move exclusives, I was fine with it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."