The explosions, water, lasers and sky look great, the rest is not acceptable. Honestly, they had a chance to evolve the formula of the game, make state-of-the-art-Wii-U graphics and give us another Splatoon-type hit. Such a wasted opportunity :(

Still looks bad tbh

if Star Fox wanted to be relevant in this modern age of gaming. Nintendo need to raise its standards for this IP and try atleast create a game that is on par with Mario Kart 8 and Smash. that is the problem with those older IPs that really didn't sell well, but if you think of it. they can really push very hard on certain games they wanted to. development and marketing wise, Nintendo can, but they seems to push back most often.

Really?

Nah because it´s clearly a 480p game, and N64 games were usually at 240p, but a n64 with expansion pack sure it can, just look, is the same with more resolution:



lol

Still looks like Gamecube 1.5 to me. I've seen better looking games on Wii:(

Wait, why does the Starfox Segment in Bayonetta 2 look better than this? They could at least said, "we'll try to base the graphics around this". Man, usually it wouldn't bother me much about graphics. But with a game like Starfox, a game that always boasted great visuals as well as gameplay, it's kind of a setback. With the Scifi genre, it isn't necessarily difficult to create stunning graphics...I guess Nintendo just wasn't looking for that.

Pretty sure Wii U can do a looooooooot better... for example:

And this:

Edit: Super Mario Galaxy on the Wii...

This game with better resolution (Dolphin) looks better.

I think the water looks great, everything else, not really.

I think the differences are not so big between those pictures, except for Mario Galaxy, that looks beautifull thanks to the wonderfull artstyle but is obviously the most outdated in those pics.

I know WiiU can do way better than Star Fox Zero graphics, but people is always making hyperboles about it, the game does not look like a n64, or a GC or a Wii game, it looks like a 360 game from 2008, wich is outdated and dissapointing but nothing close to what many people is saying. 

The differences are bigger than my hate to the Zelda team. Xenoblade is an open world JRPG, Bayonetta 2 a hack and slash while SF is just an on-rails shooter. There's no excuse to look so poor. SMG on dolphin puts to shame. The Wind Waker HD is leagues ahead of SF.