ganoncrotch said:
TheDarkBender said:
If he can't afford it, then he shouldn't get it. It's that simple. Why would he need a billionaire's car anyways, when there are far more cheaper cars available on the market? It's not like there is only one car, and only rich people can afford it. If he really wants that one, he has to work for it. Mark Cuban did the same, so why shouldn't it apply to anyone else? And the car manufacturer is still losing money, so it isn't without any consequences. If everyone just copied cars, what do you think will happen to the car manufacturers?
And that's the same reason why people shouldn't pirate. You aren't forced to buy that games that cost 60 euros, there are far more cheaper games available if you can't afford that. Or just wait for a while until there's a discount or something, or just buy budget games. For example, Steam is full of cheap games. You don't have to make a lot of money to afford it.
|
The 2 bold parts, if you can explain to me how those make sense I'll perfectly agree with you, but if it's someone who doesn't have the money to buy something, how does the manufacturer of that thing somehow lose money which the person who now has a copy of the thing he couldn't afford loose money?
Some things are made by Piracy, Notch effectively told people to pirate his game... fuck it I did years ago Pirated it, since then I've bought 2 copies of it because the game is amazing but I simply couldn't afford it at the time and I loved his mentality to it, I would more take the word of a Multi Billionaire about how piracy didn't effect his cash rather than some salty people who had shit projects shut down and tried to blame piracy for it if I'm honest.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/01/12/minecraft-creator-notch-tells-players-to-pirate-his-game/
|
Well if the person really needed a car, he shouldn't have to go for a car far out of his price range i.e the car from the billionaire. There are many different alternatives. He would still need a car somehow, so instead he would buy a cheaper car. While the luxury car seller doesn't earn any money, the one selling cheaper cars does. Or, if he doesn't even have any money for that, he could opt for public transportation, thus money goes to that. If he was just able to copy the rich man's car, money wouldn't go anywhere, except maybe to the person selling the car copy thingy. That's the same with video games. Instead of money going to the creators, it either goes nowhere or it goes to the ones hosting the torrentsites (through ads etc.) which, in my opinion, doesn't really seem fair.
As for "If he can't afford it, then he shouldn't get it", there is a reason products, like cars etc., get made, and that's to make money. Companies sell their product(s), in order to recoup their costs and in the hope of being rewarded for the risk they've taken (profit). That seems like logic to me. As such, it seems logical that, if someone wants a product, he puts his money on the table for it because he thinks it's worth it. If he doesn't think it's worth it, he should keep his money and spend it on something else. That's just basic economy really.
And there are many alternatives. He could buy other products, or even get a loan (if he really wanted said car).
While I get what you're saying with the Minecraft example, Minecraft is an anomaly. It's one of the, if not the, best selling game(s). It's a brilliant game and probably the most innovative game to come out in the last decade. There really aren't that many developers that can say the same about their game. If developers say everyone can pirate their game, it wouldn't mean that they would still recoup their costs.
I'm sure that Notch knew he had a great idea, and he just had to get it out there, even if it would be through piracy. Not every developer can say the same though. You could argue that those games just aren't worth it, of course, but then why go to the trouble of pirating it in the first place.