By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Star Fox Zero 60fps E3 Trailer!

97alexk on 25 June 2015
Cobretti2 said:
Heavenly_King said:
it is still a rail shooter or not?


sadly looks like it. no evolution what so ever. supposedly this is a series reboot game. so why not go all out with it to birning in a new generation of gamers to the series who expect a bit mroe in 2015 than a rails shooter that wil probably take an hour to finish.


well the pigma stage didint look like a rail shooter, or maybe idk what you mean



Around the Network
Volterra_90 on 25 June 2015
Cobretti2 said:
Heavenly_King said:
it is still a rail shooter or not?


sadly looks like it. no evolution what so ever. supposedly this is a series reboot game. so why not go all out with it to birning in a new generation of gamers to the series who expect a bit mroe in 2015 than a rails shooter that wil probably take an hour to finish.

Nice assumption right here. We don't know anything about the game to say this.



Samus Aran on 25 June 2015
mZuzek said:

Some people have been saying this game looks bad and it won't be any good, and stuff.

I hate people sometimes.

Edit: but honestly, I think this thread was a bit unnecessary. You could have just posted on Nintendomination. It's not like it's a new trailer.

I genuinely believe Star Fox: Adventures is much more pleasing to the eyes...

It's also my favorite Star Fox game by a long shot. The stick as a weapon was a bit stupid though.

The only fun part I saw from Star Fox Zero at E3 was the landmaster level. Flying in games is so awful.



Ultravolt on 25 June 2015

Looks very smooth! Glad they chose high frame rate over graphics. Although, the graphics don't seem that bad. It looks pretty clean.



   

Volterra_90 on 25 June 2015
mZuzek said:
Volterra_90 said:

Nice assumption right here. We don't know anything about the game to say this.

If anything, we have some evidence that suggests the opposite.

Yeah, we've seen glimpses of a lot of levels, variety in the gameplay (I'm talking about that infiltration level, which was cool)... It seems like it will be way longer thatn StarFox 64, but I don't really know, let's wait before make a judgement. It looks good to me though, I missed a lot the old-school feeling of a good Star Fox shoot'em up :D



Around the Network
d21lewis on 25 June 2015

Nostalgia overload! I want this game so badly!



Cobretti2 on 25 June 2015
mZuzek said:
Cobretti2 said:

sadly looks like it. no evolution what so ever. supposedly this is a series reboot game. so why not go all out with it to birning in a new generation of gamers to the series who expect a bit mroe in 2015 than a rails shooter that wil probably take an hour to finish.

Because Star Fox is a rail shooter game.

Ugh, this pisses me off so much.

Why the fuck can't people accept it's what it is? There's nothing wrong with a rail shooter. They're fun. And Star Fox has always been a rail shooter. That's like looking at a new Zelda game and saying "wow, it's still a 3D adventure? That sucks, I mean come on it's 2015".

Also, I highly doubt it'll take an hour to finish it.


And what it can't evolve? Metroid Prime evolved from what Metroid. COD evolved, GTA evolved, almost everything else evolved except Star Fox.

A new Star Fox game should have the freedom it had in Starfox Adventures (EVEN THOUGH it was a rebrand of another game and a vocal minority hated it) and to a degree Star Fox Assualt. These took the franchise forward, however the stubborn old fans can't get past that and want to play something they can play on their N64. The franchise has the potential to do Zelda numbers so why not try?

Why can't it have a deap story also? the characters are well designed to be iconic to all generations. Str Fox could be the third tier after mario and pokemon if they put effort into it.

I will go one step further about growth potential. Why can't star fox be a tv series? it could bring in a new segment of kids to the console because they fell in love with the characters. They need to take some risks.

Nintendo need to revamp themselves like Lego did. Look what wonders it did for them.



 

 

PwerlvlAmy on 25 June 2015

game still looks great, day one still :O



NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick

Volterra_90 on 25 June 2015
Cobretti2 said:
mZuzek said:

Because Star Fox is a rail shooter game.

Ugh, this pisses me off so much.

Why the fuck can't people accept it's what it is? There's nothing wrong with a rail shooter. They're fun. And Star Fox has always been a rail shooter. That's like looking at a new Zelda game and saying "wow, it's still a 3D adventure? That sucks, I mean come on it's 2015".

Also, I highly doubt it'll take an hour to finish it.


And what it can't evolve? Metroid Prime evolved from what Metroid. COD evolved, GTA evolved, almost everything else evolved except Star Fox.

A new Star Fox game should have the freedom it had in Starfox Adventures (EVEN THOUGH it was a rebrand of another game and a vocal minority hated it) and to a degree Star Fox Assualt. These took the franchise forward, however the stubborn old fans can't get past that and want to play something they can play on their N64. The franchise has the potential to do Zelda numbers so why not try?

Why can't it have a deap story also? the characters are well designed to be iconic to all generations. Str Fox could be the third tier after mario and pokemon if they put effort into it.

I will go one step further about growth potential. Why can't star fox be a tv series? it could bring in a new segment of kids to the console because they fell in love with the characters. They need to take some risks.

Nintendo need to revamp themselves like Lego did. Look what wonders it did for them.

What is evolving? The examples you mention are sticking in their genre since they begin. CoD is still a FPS, GTA is still an sandbox game, why can't Star Fox be still a rail shooter? Nintendo can innovate in that genre, why not? We don't know how will it play, but only the control system is different to anything we've ever played. And we don't know almost anything about the levels. I don't know what are your sources to say this. 



Areym on 25 June 2015

60 FPS is great but that game looks dated, very dated. Can't talk about gameplay as it looks very...safe, in terms of gameplay. The areas also look very lifeless, but I assume they will put some life into it before release. Not a very technically impressive game, in all honesty.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian