By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Volterra_90 on 25 June 2015
Edit Thread
Cobretti2 said:
mZuzek said:

Because Star Fox is a rail shooter game.

Ugh, this pisses me off so much.

Why the fuck can't people accept it's what it is? There's nothing wrong with a rail shooter. They're fun. And Star Fox has always been a rail shooter. That's like looking at a new Zelda game and saying "wow, it's still a 3D adventure? That sucks, I mean come on it's 2015".

Also, I highly doubt it'll take an hour to finish it.


And what it can't evolve? Metroid Prime evolved from what Metroid. COD evolved, GTA evolved, almost everything else evolved except Star Fox.

A new Star Fox game should have the freedom it had in Starfox Adventures (EVEN THOUGH it was a rebrand of another game and a vocal minority hated it) and to a degree Star Fox Assualt. These took the franchise forward, however the stubborn old fans can't get past that and want to play something they can play on their N64. The franchise has the potential to do Zelda numbers so why not try?

Why can't it have a deap story also? the characters are well designed to be iconic to all generations. Str Fox could be the third tier after mario and pokemon if they put effort into it.

I will go one step further about growth potential. Why can't star fox be a tv series? it could bring in a new segment of kids to the console because they fell in love with the characters. They need to take some risks.

Nintendo need to revamp themselves like Lego did. Look what wonders it did for them.

What is evolving? The examples you mention are sticking in their genre since they begin. CoD is still a FPS, GTA is still an sandbox game, why can't Star Fox be still a rail shooter? Nintendo can innovate in that genre, why not? We don't know how will it play, but only the control system is different to anything we've ever played. And we don't know almost anything about the levels. I don't know what are your sources to say this.