By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Graphics Comparison: Kingdom Hearts III vs Zelda: Windwaker HD

Tagged games:

 

Which game looks better?

Zelda: Windwaker HD 60 34.09%
 
Kingdom Hearts III 116 65.91%
 
Total:176
JRPGfan said:
LemonSlice said:
Looks better doesn't mean it's more technically demanding. Magical Starsign looks better than both games, and it's on the DS.

 

Its okay for a DS game.

 

It's amazing for any platform, but graphics wise DS is one of the very best.

           



Around the Network

Are you joking. You must be joking. KH 3 looks 10 year ahead of windwaker hd.



Are people voting for Windwaker because it's a "Legend of Zelda" game? WW looks good but kingdom hearts III looks way better.



From what I saw in that KH3 gameplay demo, all new assets would have to be designed in order to actually downscale KH3 enough to run on Wii U. I can't see Square Enix doing that honestly, it just does't seem financially viable given Wii U's install base. Yes, previous KH games have been on Nintendo handhelds, but Nintendo's handheld fanbase and Nintendo's console fanbase are not one and the same, there is some crossover obviously, but not enough to offset Wii U's low install base.



nvm



Gotta figure out how to set these up lol.

Around the Network

Lol. WW does look better. I'm surprised.



Gotta figure out how to set these up lol.

It is true that KH3 does look a bit similar due to the colors and design of the world, but KH3 looks more demanding. Though I think it would be possible for the Wii U to handle it. Just look at X. That is one massive looking game with more demanding looking visuals. Though KH has always been home to PS, aside from the handheld games.



 

              

Dance my pretties!

The Official Art Thread      -      The Official Manga Thread      -      The Official Starbound Thread

Well KH3 is clearly far more advanced in the graphics tech department (you may find WWHD more pleasing due to art style though) - the WiiU may have still been able to render that at 720/30, but the UE4 engine hasn't been ported to the WiiU and recreating the game on UE3 is probably too expensive for Square to consider giving it a chance tbh



Lafiel said:

Well KH3 is clearly far more advanced in the graphics tech department (you may find WWHD more pleasing due to art style though) - the WiiU may have still been able to render that at 720/30, but the UE4 engine hasn't been ported to the WiiU and recreating the game on UE3 is probably too expensive for Square to consider giving it a chance tbh

Dont worry NX consol from nintendo will be supported UE4 and other engines, im sure.

Nintendo must have realised by now, that 3rd party do matter, and actually not design their console in such a manner its unlikely to get multi plats.



WWHD does look appealing mainly due to its art style.

Graphics wise - KH3 looks way better and the final product will more likely be better looking than what we are seeing now (especially with introduction of other worlds not shown in the trailers.



    

Basil's YouTube Channel