yeah it does lol

Right! like seriously I don't even mind ps3 graphics as long as i get a destructable world. Almost no games have realism because of how shitty their physics are. Physics should matter way more that texture and some raytracing reflections that take up so much resources. I'm tired of water not splashing or waving like REAL LIFE water does. I'm tired of nothing happening to trees, rocks, weak cover barriers, and trees not doing anythimng when i hit them with an rpg or grenade. I want physical realism, not a pretty picture.

What graphics engine is treyarch using for the new Call of Duty

Really? Then you should be even more happy with the Sony conference. It isn't bias if you like a series. I mean we play many new games in a franchise because we love the series oesn't mean we shouldn't count them.

LOL, that's not the reason. Most PC gamers have builds that are on par or worst than consoles, specially considering optimization on fixed platforms. Developers can't make games that can only be played by a minuscule part of PC gamers, they need to take into account the multiple array of configurations on PC, the majority of them being underpowered.

Also the only reason you get big games on PC (with very few exceptions) is because they can sell to consoles users too, that it's were the real money it's. Most PC gamers are cheap as fuck when it comes to actually buying games, even the ones that'll spend thousands on hardware don't like spending money on games, they want to get them for free or almost free. If consoles didn't exist you'll only get MMORPGs, MOBAs, etc. Not even Valve bothers developing actual games for PC anymore.