RPG's, that's why. Which is also why if Nintendo made handheld games compatible with the home console it would do just as good.
? | |||
| Marketing | 16 | 4.89% | |
| Ultra marvelous fantastic games | 175 | 53.52% | |
| Sony need to do a better job | 47 | 14.37% | |
| Cultists fans | 26 | 7.95% | |
| More mainstream | 21 | 6.42% | |
| Cheaper development, more profit | 25 | 7.65% | |
| Unique hardware features | 17 | 5.20% | |
| Total: | 327 | ||
RPG's, that's why. Which is also why if Nintendo made handheld games compatible with the home console it would do just as good.
Not much competition. And because Nintendo handhelds get much more and better games than Nintendo home consoles!
| Dulfite said: Nintendo pumps out so many 1st party games on their handheld that it hurts their Wii U development, where as Sony clearly supports the ps4 MUCH MUCH more than the Vita. Sales for the 3ds are MUCH higher than the Vita and ps4 sales are higher than the Wii U's. |
Sony barely provides something good for ps4.
Because that's just the normal order of things in the game industry. The stars are aligned for Nintendo to win and nobody else just like Sony winning the console war.
/s

Ryng_Tolu said:
Game Gear. Atari Linx. PlayStation portable PlayStation Vita ... |
You call Game Gear and Atari Linx competition? o.O
Dr.Vita said:
|
No offense, but if for you the Game Gear is not a competition, not even PSVita is, because GameGear sold 10.5 million 11 million lifetime, Vita will be lucky if will sell 15 million... Seriusly, if you ask me, Game Gear is more succesful than PSVita, considering It was a NEW console, not the successor of a 80 million user.

The arguments about comparing the handheld market with the mobile market really don´t make sense, they´re completely different devices with different basic functions............this would only make sense if we also use the same criteria and start to compare consoles and PC market, something that people who insists in that argument never do.
