| shikamaru317 said: So, I got into the Battlefield 1 beta early. It's ok, but it didn't really blow me away. The WW1 setting is great, I love the weapons and the calvary stuff, but all of the underlying issues I've always had with Battlefield games are still there. 64 player matches are still too hectic, spawn killing still happens too often, time to kill is still too high, recoil is still too high, snipers are still hard to use, tanks are still over powered (even more so than the previous games because infantry have no long range anti-tank weapons afaik). There are two game modes in the beta, Conquest and Rush. Conquest is decent, Rush is horrible. I've only gotten into games on 1 map, a desert map which seems to be ok. The game is pretty, I will say that much about it, Frostbite is easily one of the best engines graphically, and the graphical improvements from SW Battlefront have carried over to BF1. Now that I've played betas for 3 of the 4 shooters releasing this Holiday, I'd rank them Titanfall 2 > Gears 4 > Battlefield 1. That just leaves CoD I haven't played. At the very least I know that CoD 4 Remastered will have great MP, even if CoD: IW doesn't. |
Sounds pretty much as if you want a CoD with Battlefield as name 
Recoil, longer killing time and hard to use snipers are all important in my opinion. Can't imagine to run over a big Battlefield map to reach some spot if these things would be different.












W.T.F
