Alt removed - Carl
? | |||
Yes, that'd be satisfactory | 130 | 31.18% | |
Still wouldn't be good enough | 84 | 20.14% | |
Wii U's graphics are already fine | 203 | 48.68% | |
Total: | 417 |
Some of the Wii U games look absolutely stunning, it is pointless in my opinion. Art style plays a big part of it, but if you look at MK8, 3D World or even Captain Toad, flawless 60 fps with charming but no over-the-top graphics is the way to go!
megafenix said:
And yea, although graphics arent everything on a game is what has been selling consoles better in this generation, market just wants us to be suprised and hyoed by graphics when at the end all turned into empty promises like witcher 3, watch dogs, Infamous Second Son, etc Just hope splatoon really turns out like what mario kart is for racing games to remind us that is not just graphics but also the how you stylish them and the fun gameplay |
Have you even played any of those games? Cause it sure looks like you've been nowhere near them if you think they are all about graphics, specially Witcher 3.
HoloDust said:
|
I think he's using them as examples of games that (graphically) didn't meet the standards of their initial reveal. I have no idea why inFamous:SS would be included in that though. Outside of a few cosmetic changes (like that cutscene that they changed from mid-day to sunset), the end product looked essentially identical to the reveal.
I think TW3 and WD match their console reveals too (i'll have to check on that one though). It was the PC versions that saw significant visual cuts.
SubiyaCryolite said:
Are you serious? |
yeah
HoloDust said:
|
Yea, i ahve played them, watch dogs is average, second son is ok but not a boom, but as for witcher 3 i give it a 9.5, but all of them were a lie about the promised graphics
Second son(i see lower textures, less detailed things, etc)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxjRbiqrVlY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12N-SgebCKs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxjRbiqrVlY
Witcher 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX_WePhiYHE
watch dogs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX4HTUuCy3k
JNK said: yeah |
I see. With the exact same assets I don't think the game would have any problems running at 1080p60.
DonFerrari said:
|
I'm not convinced that GTAV and Witcher 3 would be able to run at a locked 60fps on PS4 if the res was dropped to 720p. That Jaguar CPU just seems so weak. But I guess we'll never know. Which is sad because those games are just begging to be played at 60fps
Locknuts said:
I'm not convinced that GTAV and Witcher 3 would be able to run at a locked 60fps on PS4 if the res was dropped to 720p. That Jaguar CPU just seems so weak. But I guess we'll never know. Which is sad because those games are just begging to be played at 60fps |
Would depend on twiking... but yes the CPU isn't powerfull... anyway as I said you wanted a console closer to PS4 but with more CPU and less GPU
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."