I don't see AAA dying, I just see overinflated budgets that need to be changed, those that refuse to budge their budget ideals need to get with reality and adapt.

In case you haven't noticed there are plenty of other venues to choose from other than just only Sony...

Yeah nintendo and microsoft

I know you by now, quit making up excuses like that, you'd rather Sony than those other two and now you;re just using them as a shield, at the end of the day more than anything you'd love Sony to gain Kojima as an exclusive dev so stop using the other two as a shield for your own desire and just admit it because I;ve hardly seen you gushing about Nintendo or Microsoft's endevours or anything they get.

I would like the games to be funded in the first place when it comes to japanese games espacially. If MS for example spends tons of money its good for us and japan. What does it give me if the game doesnt exist at all just because its not on my favorite platform? Even if i dislike the xbox brand the most from all consoles i wouldnt mind kojimas games being exclsuive there if thats what it takes his games to be done.

Here is one example where i am just advocating that....

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=199704&page=1

I'd like games to be funded too but as you can see consoles are not funding every single game on this planet, to say they do is a blatant lie, there are other venues where games thrive just as much but you seem admant on ignoring that fact, I don't think you'll really see it as a win for MS because you know if they paid they'd lose exclusivity because you know how they function so of course it would be good for you if Sony didn't have to take the hit.

"What does it give me if the game doesnt exist at all just because its not on my favorite platform?" that is going to need some translation because I don't get at all what you mean by "what does it give me".

If you don't mind Kojimas games being exclusive to MS then why do you care if they were multiplat?, for some reason you;re totally okay with his games in the future being limited in scope and platform even if you refuse to buy the other platform which you'd miss out on but if his games were multiplatform then you or anyone else wouldn't miss out, for some reason to you multiplats are somehow dying so damn fast and aren't a thing that should exist unless one console pays for it to happen while ignoring all the other venues.

I don't care if you're advocating that game, it's clear you wouldn't buy the console anyway so you're just supporting exclusivity instead of trying to reach more people.

I think Sony is the best place for him. I don't care much though, i only care about what happens to Silent Hills.

Info added to the op. I think I figured it out guys

If a Japanese company censored such an important guy as Kojima, I cant even imagine what the subject could be...

So Konami didn't want Kojima to implement certain contain/subjects into MGS5? The dude had a bomb implanted into a females private region and they let that through. I love MGS but Hideo is a weird guy to say the least. I can't say everything he has done with MGS has been sensible. From switching protagonist's in MGS2, the completely stupid and out-of-place love subplot of Meryl/Akiba, to the action focused gameplay of MGS4(stacks of customizible full automatic weapons) to plots that make absolutely zero sense(MGS4). I still love the franchise though and it won't be the same without Hideo. I am pretty certain the Konami-lead MGS games after this will not be of the same caliber and will probably get pumped out every 2-3 years.