As much as i think this franchise has potential,this game deserves to be trashed by reviewers.Supporting a game that devalues our money so much is bad message for developers.People should wait this game to be cheaper to buy it.

This is whats wrong with gaming journalism... they should review it after they patched some stuff up.. added a few hours, making it shinier, added a weather system and day and night cycle...

I was just teasing. I actually love Resident Evil 6 and I don't care what metacritic says. :P

4/10 from giant bomb

When the game was initially revealed I thought it was going to be a modified-history FPS, and i was excited, but the more the game was revealed the more I lost interest.

Will still pick it up, but im not expecting much.

Look at the positive here guys. A 60 is green for movies on Metacritic.

Down to 63 on meta, with EGM and Metro scoring it very low.

It's metascore is now getting dangerously close to Ryse on X1.

PACHTER WHAT HAVE YOU DONE

it has begun

Metacritic 63 Flop

Interesting that a few reviewers are quite looking forward to a sequel. But for a game to get a sequel it needs to sell well enough on its own, and for a game to sell well it typically needs to review well. But the reviewers are, perhaps rightly, not giving it sufficiently positive reviews for it to be assured of selling well. So the reviewers who are giving it mediocre scores but hoping for a sequel are doing all they can to ensure there is no sequel.

I liked Jim Sterlings review, he mentioned several times that he wants to see what happens next, but if the meta is around the score he gave it (6.5/10) he probably won't get to see his wish fulfilled. Very much a wasted opportunity, I suppose if this is how it turns out.

Metacritic has 22 reviews up and it's on 63.