youre swinging between comments all over the place here.

The interview where he says "its impossible to beat in that time" was conducted a week ago, when rumors were going around claiming 2-3 hours, the 5 hours thing only started a few days ago, first from the pstrophies website, where the user later posted on their forums to say he played for quite a while before he got the first trophy - and then the youtube video of the walkthrough.

Given that the only time related rumors going around at the time the "impossible" comment was made, was 2-3 hours, Im not really seeing how that is lying.

Next up the facebook comment regarding less than 5 hours, "Strange indeed - also not true." And it isnt, because theyre using trophy unlock times, not actual game time.

And lastly, the twitter note that he wont be commenting further on completion times, which is just in general.

If the game had an embargo on footage (which it almost certainly would have) then it's understandable that he'd get banned. Especially since YT would count every one of those videos as individual offences (though if he had no prior warnings he might be able to argue it as one big offence, in which case they would unban him and put him right to his last warning).

If the Dev has nothing to hide and knows the length is longer than the youtube walkthrough, then why not just tell us and squish all these talks bout its length. Its better ot be honest and just say it then trying to hide it . Whens the review embargo over for this game?

That has been up since february 4th at the very latest

Because that never happens the other way around ever right? Let's not pretend like people commenting on something they don't intend to buy is some new thing and The Order is falling victim to an unparalled hate campaign or some crap like that. This is standard fare with exclusives (regardless of platforms), and even multiplatform games as well for that matter (of course nobody gets bent out of shape when it happens to them because hell they're not exclusive so who really cares if they get bashed right).

This game simply happens to appear to have quite a few shortcomings and people wanna talk about it cus that's just what people do.

While the console logs the dates trophies were obtained, unreleased games that havent had the server side support for said trophies activated yet don't unlock and show on trophy tracking sites until the server side supports enabled.

If you get a review copy early, or even a retail copy too far ahead of street date, unlocking trophies works locally but doesnt show when you attempt to trophy sync.

So while he got the trophies on feb 4th, they wouldnt have shown up on the site until a few days later.

Lock: There is confusion on if this comment is about 3 hours or 5 hours which is a big difference on what can be or is "false Advertisement". Until there is proof on what the comment was referring to im going to ask this to be locked

This is the fourth thread on the exact same subject. People can talk about the game all they want, but someone making a thread on this games apparent length, waiting for the thread to die off, and then someone making the thread again with the exact same intention is ridiculous. 

But of course you can hate the game all you want. And you will.  As will the usual people. Obviously, the potential of games on other consoles failing is very appealing to a great deal of people. Seems sad to me.

Locking as per request (I think for sure this time!)

Im saying the rumor didnt start a few days ago.  Im however asking for a lock due to it cant or hasnt been proved one way or the other.