So on one side of things I personally don't care about the length. As long as it has a good story and fun enough gameplay thats all that matters to me. In fact plenty of other games are on the shorter side ranging from 5-10 hours. However if he is lying would that not fall under false advertisent as well as turn off a lot of gamers who believed in Ready at Dawn?
So this is where the question lays. Who is lying? Is it the YouTuber or Ready at Dawn? Either way you look at it, this will be a controversial release with either the haters being wrong, or the people praising it being wrong. The threads will be chaos I'm sure.
After a youtube channel posted a "supposed" complete walkthrough of The Order 1886 that took an entirety of 5.5 hours including cutscenes The Order by Ready at Dawn CEO Ru Weerasuriya, as told through Eurogamer, in response to the concerns about playtime.
“I know there are numbers out there,” he said. “I know why the question comes up. I know numbers have been put out there that are actually not right. It’s impossible to finish the game in that time, so we know the numbers are wrong.”
“Do we all need to do the same thing?” he asks. “I hope people who do like these kind of games, do play them. But I also want to be in an industry where me as a gamer, I’m given the choice to do that. I’ve played games that lasted two hours that were better than games that I played for 16 hours. That’s the reality of it.”
Note: I am done commenting on clickbait rumors about game length, "downgrade" idiocy and such nonsense. Don't bother asking.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2015-02-16-ready-at-dawn-responds-to-concern-over-the-order-1886s-campaign-length?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialoomph
http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2015/02/16/the-order-1886-developer-makes-a-flawed-argument-about-game-length/









