By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Is Splatoon being rushed?

Frogger on 04 February 2015
Paatar said:


Nah. I actually see that something. It is a perfect game for it. Now, wheather it will be free dlc or paid is the question. Nintendo sometimes does free, but when they do paid, it is actually worth it.

 

Regarding the post, no, I do not believe it is rushed. Deciding not to add options in is not rushing it.


Adding an entire new game mode isn't just something you throw in for free.



Around the Network
WhiteEaglePL on 04 February 2015

No it's just dumb Nintendo being dumb again.

Even Kid Icarus Uprising had 2 online game modes. :/



Skullwaker on 04 February 2015
Smeags said:
My biggest takeaway from the news today was the Hero Mode, which really caters to me as a gamer (Platformer style single player mode) so in that case I'm actually even more excited for the game.

This is how I feel as well.

OT: No, I don't think it's rushed, just Nintendo making ignorant decisions. Hopefully they reverse their course on some of these things. ESPECIALLY the online modes.



Official Tokyo Mirage Sessions #FE Thread

                                      

Frogger on 04 February 2015

It's not rushed. Nintendo actually thinks this is a good idea. Legit stupidity.



Paatar on 04 February 2015
spemanig said:
Paatar said:


Nah. I actually see that something. It is a perfect game for it. Now, wheather it will be free dlc or paid is the question. Nintendo sometimes does free, but when they do paid, it is actually worth it.

 

Regarding the post, no, I do not believe it is rushed. Deciding not to add options in is not rushing it.


Adding an entire new game mode isn't just something you throw in for free.


And paying $40 for a couple maps, new guns that were already made in all the "SUPER AMAZING AAA MATURE" titles isn't something you pay for.

 

Point is, Nintendo would throw it in for free. And if they don't, they'll actually give it a reasonable price.



[Switch Friend code: 3909-3991-4970]

[Xbox Live: JissuWolfe]

[PSN: Jissu]

Around the Network
Roma on 04 February 2015

It would have been nice if they added a mode where you should shoot the enemies with as little paint splattered in the level as possible. and the ones that have the most paint loses



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(

t3mporary_126 on 04 February 2015
Roma said:
It would have been nice if they added a mode where you should shoot the enemies with as little paint splattered in the level as possible. and the ones that have the most paint loses


Interesting ideas. This also got me thinking that 4 vs 4 matches could be forced but there could be several types of 4 vs 4 matches that you could find yourself in once the game starts.

So maybe there are multiple modes of 4 vs 4 online matches but we're not able to select which ones. We just choose 4 vs 4, start the match, and the game tells us what sort of special mode it randomly created for us. If they do this every once in a while, it could add some variety to the online random matches. 

I still rather choose which mode I want to play and let us have bots, 3 vs 3 matches, or lower in random online though.



Frogger on 04 February 2015
Paatar said:


And paying $40 for a couple maps, new guns that were already made in all the "SUPER AMAZING AAA MATURE" titles isn't something you pay for.

 

Point is, Nintendo would throw it in for free. And if they don't, they'll actually give it a reasonable price.


Are you even reading your own post? Yes, it is.

You clearly have too much faith in Nintendo. If Nintendo would make you pay $60 for only one multiplayer mode, why on Earth would you think they'd be reasonable about more? Why would anyone even think they'd provide more in the first play when they clearly think that one is good enough for $60 already?



Paatar on 04 February 2015
spemanig said:
Paatar said:


And paying $40 for a couple maps, new guns that were already made in all the "SUPER AMAZING AAA MATURE" titles isn't something you pay for.

 

Point is, Nintendo would throw it in for free. And if they don't, they'll actually give it a reasonable price.


Are you even reading your own post? Yes, it is.

You clearly have too much faith in Nintendo. If Nintendo would make you pay $60 for only one multiplayer mode, why on Earth would you think they'd be reasonable about more? Why would anyone even think they'd provide more in the first play when they clearly think that one is good enough for $60 already?

You know what I meant. Do not start attacking me.

For one, the game is not only multiplayer. You pay $60 for online multi, single player, local multiplayer and a whole lot more.

Second, Nintendo is the most reasonable big company out there right now.



[Switch Friend code: 3909-3991-4970]

[Xbox Live: JissuWolfe]

[PSN: Jissu]

Roma on 04 February 2015
t3mporary_126 said:
Roma said:
It would have been nice if they added a mode where you should shoot the enemies with as little paint splattered in the level as possible. and the ones that have the most paint loses


Interesting ideas. This also got me thinking that 4 vs 4 matches could be forced but there could be several types of 4 vs 4 matches that you could find yourself in once the game starts.

So maybe there are multiple modes of 4 vs 4 online matches but we're not able to select which ones. We just choose 4 vs 4, start the match, and the game tells us what sort of special mode it randomly created for us. If they do this every once in a while, it could add some variety to the online random matches. 

I still rather choose which mode I want to play and let us have bots, 3 vs 3 matches, or lower in random online though.

yeah I would rather choose as well.

anywho I just pre-ordered the game as I'm mostly looking foreword to the sp mode 



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(