generic-user-1 said: they should make a deal with disney... nintendo gets the game licenses form diseny and disney the movie right from nintendo. |
that's actually not such a bad idea however the issue is that Nintendo's IP's are worth an incredible amount (probably more than their company is currently valued)
I mean the Mario IP I have no idea how high some companies/groups would pay to have
Nintendo is the last company with as many recognizable IP's as to rival Disney. so I don't think I would like that deal just because it would give Disney a total monopoly over the entertainment industry (at least potentially in films)
also bear in mind the reason that Nintendo has not made featured films often with their characters is because they worry about hurting their brand and are very very careful in terms of maintaining the value and representation of their IP's. they apparently are brought movie pitches quite often
I do think it is an interesting concept though the Disney thing you bring up- it would certainly do a large boost to Nintendo to be the exclusive game producer of Disney franchises, and it would match their user base (Nintendo fans + family's + kids) fine
I think the real issue with it though is that it would benefit Disney far more than Nintendo. The Nintendo IPs (Zelda, Mario, Metroid, Pokemon) could do ginormous figures as films
one thing that blows my mind though ist hat Nintendo has never made large amusement parks
look how popular Disney World is- or even Universal Studios. Nintendo has a kajillion characters and universes in which it could make rides and attractions for, and I could see it being as popular as any other theme parks on the planet
as for the OP's question about the baseball team- if it's making them 200m a year currently then why would they sell it? to make the value of a company/asset in 5 years time (1 billion / 5 = 200m) is an incredibly successful investment
also bear in mind that they've owned the team for quite a while and probably made back their investment costs long ago. at this point it is an asset that is just making them money from year to year
cash flow is not the problem. Nintendo has cash. I think OP you were suggesting maybe that Nintendo get more cash on hand (rather than maintain assets) to possibly purchase another big studio. but they can already take over a game studio that is under 1b and any studio that's over would be CONSIDERABLY over (i.e. Capcom) and very risky to consume