Again PS3 fanboys comparing apples to oranges trying to justify their overpriced R&D nightmare. They can't make an argument for it comparing it to the 360 and Wii so now they're trying to make it look good against things that aren't even its intended competition, PCs, which from the arguments sound just as good. I'd also put five bucks down that a PC would easily outlast a PS3 in lifetime anyday, which isn't saying much in regards to a Sony product. First it was "ALL THE EXCLUSIVES THE PS3 WAS GOING TO HAVE!" and now as exclusive by exclusive dissapears they're left to squabling over what few games the PS3 has left.
MGS4 - Konami says will be on 360 as well.
FFXIII - Which will be spread out over all the major platforms including cellphones, and right now the most critically acclaimed installment is one of the cellphone games, not the PS3 games. And there's alot of time between now and FFXIII's release for Square to decide maybe it doesn't want PS3 exclusives in its harem.
| Legend11 said: Maybe Sony really does indeed plan on the PS3 being their main console platform for 10 years, afterall it's likely that it'll be at least several years before it even begins to have a chance of being profitable (they're losing close to $250 for each system sold1, that would require a lot of games to be bought in order for Sony to make that money back (licensing fees are roughly between $3-$10 per unit)2. And all of this doesn't take into account the billions of dollars Sony spent on the development of the PS3.
|
While I commend you for your provided sources, I don't think anyone (except maybe Sammygee) would be willing to debate the fact with you that Sony's in deep shit in the first place lol. (lol, IGN, Sony owned, lol)
