Lyrikalstylez said: What happened when $50 was a years subscription ? Screw this shit |
PS+ is a different service. This is PS Now.
Lyrikalstylez said: What happened when $50 was a years subscription ? Screw this shit |
PS+ is a different service. This is PS Now.
I wouldn't find the value of it because I have gamefly already so most of not all these games I can get through that on my brothers ps3.but if it was like 70$ a year and worked properly(not sure if it works 100 percent well, I'm not trolling) then I would pounce on this so hard.
Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out
Ps4:110million
Xbox one :75 million( was 65)
Wii u: 20 milliion
Yay i want to try it out I hope the service soon includes ps1 games... With a 20/20 Mbit connection , i,m ready And what's with all the haters?
I agree with the opening post in that this is great for people getting to know their new console. Comparing it to a service like gamefly isn't fair because they are too different animals. It is awful if you look at an annual cost because people like more control over what games they have for their consoles. The ala carte of ownership will always trump the sampler style which is being presented here. It does have a market... just not a very big one.
Feel free to check out my stream on twitch
Don't know why people are complaining, this is definitely a fair price.
$15 is the price for a large pizza in nyc. $44.99 or $15 for 3 months is like a PS Now diet.
I'd be willing to do a month but I can't imagine all the games will appeal to me. However I have a PS3 so i would be more inclined to use that 180 towards buying used on Ebay. Could be the service will be great but I will never get to experience it since my internet is sub-par (the price of privacy living out in the middle of nowhere).
Lyrikalstylez said: What happened when $50 was a years subscription ? Screw this shit |
That's for PS+, which hasn't changed.
Soonerman said: If thus came as part of the PS+ service at no additional cost it'd be worth it. As a stand alone this is way inferior to EA's Access and not worth the extra price. |
LOL I forgot about Sony cockblocking EA's service. No freaking wonder they did that.
I hope they don't need a lot of subscribers to maintain this, I can't see them getting many with that high price and list of games. If they're truly going for people who don't own PS consoles then they need to price it lower. If someone is remotely interested in gaming, has great Internets, and has $180 a year to blow, they probably already own a console.
Given how much this relies on your internet connection and that there are definitely drawbacks like more delay (whether you feel it or not) and worse picture quality...
I will wait for a test for myself until I make a decision but this might take a while since I am living in EU.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.