I disagree. Darksiders 2 was more "Zelda" in design than the first, which leaned a bit towards God of War

its pretty fun

Hmm... no. At least 3D Zelda games have nice puzzle design (sometimes archaic, but still...), while Darksiders II's puzzles consist too many times in that giant ball that you have to move in order to take it somewhere and help opening doors and that kind of stuff; other puzzles are too simple, even more simple. Now, combat is very different to Zelda games, it's faster and more similar to a hack n' slash title and also features a crafting system, where you can grab stuff that defeated enemies leave. Zelda games do this too... but not at that level of complexity.

Darksiders II also involves platforming, Zelda games rarely do this (although Skyward Sword kinda uses it too) and Vigil's game is too linear. Now that I think about it, Darksiders II is kinda similar to Skyward Sword, but for some reason the second one feels better.

Darksiders II is good, but not very comparable to 3D Zelda entries, at least the classic ones.

I loved the first one, plan on getting the second one soon.

I liked it.

I wouldnt say its perfect, it definitly could use improvements and more characters, but it flowed pretty well.

Played it for 3 hours then put it away and never touched it again.

I've had it for ages but yet to play it. Glad to hear it is a good game. Will try to play this soon.

I've been looking for it in stores, but it seems to be all gone now - at least for the Wii U. I've only found copies on Amazon, and even there they only have 3 copkes left.

I played the first game on PC, but really wanna play this one on a console

I didn´t play it, but the first one was boring as hell for me, very repetitive. Don´t know how much better is the second part.

It is an excellent alternative for every Zelda fan, especially for those that want a more "mature", "dark" and "gritty" Zelda. 

It does start slow with a lot of boring "corridors", but it will become better later on.