Things are getting a little heated in here. Let's keep on topic and keep the generalizations out of it please.
Things are getting a little heated in here. Let's keep on topic and keep the generalizations out of it please.
Conegamer said: Things are getting a little heated in here. Let's keep on topic and keep the generalizations out of it please. |
Hope you don't mind if I criticise EG.
GTAexpert said:
Hope you don't mind if I criticise EG. |
Go for it. So long as it doesn't get too heated!
lol, its an opinion and a valid one if you ask me, stop getting so hyped over it.
Follow my Gaming and Graphics Business on facebook and on Twitter:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=101878997952596&ref=br_rs
What's getting on my nerves is the suggestion that "Old school design" is a bad thing... my game of the year is Wolfenstein so far, definitely one of the best shooters this year and was awesome, guess what it got criticised for... old school game design.
Unfortunately I feel a lot of gaming sites want to be designers, and have forgotten to just enjoy the games..
@cone, you were hottier as a dog, your human form isn't that much sexier. I hope that don't count as mod criticizing :)
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
dane007 said:
That if they don't give the score you agree with , then they are anti sony? You cannot expect all reviewers to share teh same tase as you ro other gamers on sony platform, MS platform and even nintendon platform. There will always be people who prefer xbox games more, nintendo games more or even sony games more. Also every game is reviewed by someone else, therefore the scores will be different and the way they reviewe will also be differerent. They have given lots of good scores for sony games as welll. Just taht this generation the games to them is not that great . nothing wrong with that . |
I'll try to find the thread but I believe that a while back (several years) someone did a metascore of eurogamer scores and there was like a persistent 20 point difference between ps3 and 360 games. And was always above the metacritic average on 360 and below on ps3.
ie: if the metacritic of a 360 game was 80, i believe they would give a 86-91. The calculations showed consistent 5-10 point above average scores.
and if the ps3 game was 80, the calculations showed an 20~ ish point under rating.
I guess until I find the thead though, this is all heresay, but it was done using calculations from the top 50 games and review score vs meta. Basically a trend of rating 360 games 30 points higher. However, games that tended to be reviewed by mainland europe would rate the ps games better, while uk would rate badly.
riderz13371 said: Allow me to repost this exquisite comment made on the Eurogamer thread: "We only have to look at The Crew, Assassins Creed: Unity and Halo the Master Chief Collection to know that this year publishers have really been pushing their luck when it comes to releasing games that are a little bit broken" |
A game whose online doesn't even work get a 9/10? Well there goes any credibility Eurogamer had.
uran10 said: lol, its an opinion and a valid one if you ask me, stop getting so hyped over it. |
Sure maybe it is a valid one. The problem is when someone takes a broken game like Halo MCC and gives it a 9/10 I automatically don't trust anything you say. So maybe he they are right but I'll need to hear it from someone with far more credibility then eurogamer.
Angelus said: I find it pretty amusing how many people are acting like the media is just trying to unfairly butcher this game before release lol It's absolutely excruciating watching "gameplay" of this title. I mean there's a fucking QTE/button prompts for something like a character doing a 3.2.1 countdown. Like seriously? You know it's bad when you gotta push triangle for a character to say 3....triangle, 2....etc. Honestly. I get the impression that the guys who made this realized at some point that there's way too much cutscene compared to gameplay so they just threw in button prompts everywhere to make the player feel like they're actually contributing to the experience. Mindboggling |
It's meant to keep you engaged throughout the entire game, even whilst you are not in actual control (ie a cutscene). Would you rather the character just say 3 2 1 grenade without you doing anything? Maybe you prefer that, and thats fine, but I like to feel engaged in a video game and the fact that they are actually letting you participate even in a cutscene is absolutely fantastic for me. Now instead of putting the controller down and watching the cutscene you can actually "play" a cutscene, even if it is just a button prompt.