A question to everyone that debates the graphics more than the gameplay: Isn't more important that the gameplay looks utterly fantastic compared to if the graphics are the best ever made? The game looks good, perfectly fine, but it was the action that i found amazing.

FROM DISAPPOINTED OF GAMEPLAY! AND DRAKE ISN'T HOT ANYMORE!

There will be, after Uncharted 1, every NaughtyDog has a ton of locations to visit.

There's technology from the last of us here. (TLoU had technology from Uncharted).
It's their way of making a fantastic game.It looks really goOd!!!!

Just watched again, WOW and WOW !
http://www.gamersyde.com/hqstream_uncharted_4_a_thief_s_end_psx_gameplay_demo-33743_en.html

''It appears gamersyde footage isn't representative of how good the game actually looks, with limited RGB gamma settings and blacks looking like slightly grey (noticeable at the ND logo). Someone has accounted for this on GAF and corrected the footage. WARNING OVER 3.8 GB! worth it though.''

https://mega.co.nz/#!NBcA3BiK!AB4PDO...KuvAZFMtlDQdwo

Yeah it is one quickly becoming one of the best things about Naughty Dog game reveals. After seeing people that even dare to downplay The Last of Us it is not surprising though.

The gameplay looks fantastic, so many improvements everywhere. It seems much more open without loosing the Uncharted touch. I doubt that they would get anywhere close to 60 FPS with so big detailed environments and vegetation though. We'll see.

My thoughts exactly. I love how the game looks but the gameplay is what really sells it.

This was a brilliant reminder of how uninterested I am in the core gameplay mechanics of uncharted. Looks solid though, if not a tad below my expectations.

Uncharted 3.5 :p