Lmao, your arguments are beyond stupid.

First of all, metacritic user scores for Nintendo games are often very accurate (the average of them I mean). Second of all, did you even read anything in this thread? It's not about whether or not GTA is a better game or not than SSB, it's about remakes of one year old games scoring higher.

Third of all, did you read some of the metaceritic "professional" reviews? Some of them are more laughable than the user reviews! Hence why there's currently a popular meme in existence about games having too much water.

And story in a Zelda game? Have you ever even played a single Zelda game? No one cares about the story, it's practically non-existant. There's a thing called watching/reading reviews and let's plays of games. I don't need to have played GTA V to know what the story is about. Just like I don't need to have played Sonic 06 to know how horrible that story is.

Clearly the people actually playing DK: TF enjoyed it more than the critics, so what does that tell you about these so called "professional" reviews who's opinion you seem to think are facts? Just because a game has a higher score on metacritic doesn't mean the gaming community thinks  the same. When the difference is as small as 2-3% it matters even less.

There's a huge difference between what critics think of a game and what the average gaming community thinks of something. Critics can be bought off as well which reflects a lot of metacritic review scores.

I don't care if people think GTA V is better than SSB4, that's a perfectly ok opinion to have. And since I haven't played both games how can I comment on it? What I find ridiculous is a one year old remake getting such high reviews. Why on earth would I want a remake of Super Mario 3D World for example? The game came out a year ago.

Lmao, your arguments are beyond stupid.

First of all, metacritic user scores for Nintendo games are often very accurate (the average of them I mean). Second of all, did you even read anything in this thread? It's not about whether or not GTA is a better game or not than SSB, it's about remakes of one year old games scoring higher. 

It's not even relevant when comparing games of the same genre because of unfair biases.

Is LIttle Big Planet 3 really that much worse than Little Big Planet 2? Somehow I doubt it. 

"Personal insults such as this are the hallmark of a weak argument, and against forum rules, this will be reported."

I didn't call you stupid, I called your arguments stupid. That's not a personal attack, so reporting me for that is pathetic (though on this site you can get banned for less I suppose). Reporting me is what I call a true hallmark of a weak argument.

"There is nothing special about "nintendo" user scores, all games on all systems suffer from artifically high and artifically low reviews, don't act like they don't."

Artificially high scores cancel out the artificially low scores. What's your point? There's a big difference between the user scores of Nintendo games and the user scores of the other consoles. A lot of high profile games on the PS4 or XBONE have average user scores of 3.9 or something. It's hard to take those serious as I don't believe even COD games are that bad.

"A popular meme spawned off of a single review, and what of the other 30+? a single reviewers impact to the overall meta is very low."

That was just one example, you're not seriously expexting me to comment on every review individually are you?

"I'm the type of person to read the dialog of a game and explore it to exhaustion, if you think Zelda games lack story you are clearly the skip all text and cutscene and sprint to the endgame type, that's your fault not mine."

Eh, I read everything. The story in Zelda games is nothing special, it's just there as an excuse to solve dungeons and defeat enemies. Haven't played Majora's Mask though, I heard that game is different and has interesting side stories and great characters.

"And clearly there are people who bought DK:TF and hated it since used copies were up on ebay litterally the next day, and have been since, that however, just like instances of people "enjoying it" is simply a case by case occurance, just like "well my friend is buying x console" or "well my local store sold out of y console", its isolated, and not representitive of the larger userbase/populace."

Every game has used copies on ebay, you're making no sense at all. Clearly the majority of those who bought the game loved it. I could easily prove this by making a thread here asking what they thought of the game. I'm also in no way denying that the majority of the gamers who played GTA V and The Last of Us loved it. This is purely about the one year old remakes as far as I'm concerned, NOT the original games.

"Clearly you do care enough to be so offended by it, as to be overly critical about it purely based on it being "a year old game", wether its a year old game or a ten year old game, the fact of the matter is, enough effort, changes and upgrades were made for it to be seen as a worthwhile purchase and has been scored as such."

I'm not offended by the original GTA V having a higher score than SSB4. Try again. 

But is it? Hmmmmm...... Maybe, just maybe!

Both the last gen and current gen versions scored higher, and this isn't even really a re-release, simply a delayed next gen version.

Yes it is. You learn something new everyday

Perhaps GTA V is a better game? Just a thought...