A bulldozer can mow down huge rocks and tons of dirt. Surely it can withstand a few thousand bodies.

I'm very much in love with zombi movies, and have seen a lot of them, but clearly, that's the weakness of the genre. It's hard to believe we would lose. Just a wall is enough to stop them.

"Dawn of the Dead" explore indecisiveness and individualism as the main factor for failure. People arguing endlessly, people protecting their family, cops fleeing, slow reaction. It's quite realistic. I mean, so much of the current problems could be solved if the politics just did something. Most movies are just about "let's shoot them all". But when do you decide to kill your own people when you don't know if there is a cure, if it's temporary. When someone get the highly contagious and dangerous ebola, do we just kill him and burn him, or do we make tremendous effort to cure him ? If New Yord felt in a matter of days, would we just nuke the place ?
"The Dead" is quite good to make a defeat believable in Africa. Spare resources (to be used locally), bad infrastructures, nowhere to get a refuge.

Watch 28 days/weeks later pl0x

Nope, you are not thinking about it the right way. You don't have to run them down. I said "MOW" them down. Think driving slow at 15M/hr. Slow enough to even be handing out flyers.

And that point you made about stupid humans running into a zombie infested building after a dog? I can PROMISE you. That shit only hapens in the movies. You would be surprised how effective a human beings fight/flight response is.

I did, and the plot simply didn't make sense. Where were the tanks? Where were the helicopters? Where were the jets? Where were the freaking bombs and explosives?

In order to make zombies look dangerous, we have to strip down what humans have and just give them guns. Come on now, again, how can even a million zombies break through one M1 Abrams tank?

We wouldn't. A bunch of a tanks + air support would wipe out a hoarde of stupid zombies in about 15 minutes. From that point on you just have to contain the disease from spreading.

Zombies would be fairly easy to wipe out. Lets consider

1.) They are slow moving

2.) They are dumber than a dog

3.) They can be easily baited/lured into an area.

4.) Humans are smarter, faster, and have access to guns, bombs, grenades, and the ability to communicate/organize.

This wouldn't even be a fair fight. 

ikr??? Just watch any news network and see how quickly the riot gear and machinery or national guard comes up whenever there is any kinda civil unrest. Yest somehow thee things all fall apart during a zombie apocalypse. 

Just look at what human beings do to eachother for random shit lik eoil or having diffeent beliefs.. now imagine what we would do to zombies for being dead and not wanting to stay dead and wanting to make us dead too or worse? have us for dinner. It wouldn't be funny at all.

Zombies would win cause they will not be tied down by emotions.. Besides fear of a large flesh eating group running towards you could you shoot your mother if she was infected? Ah.. You spended a second thinking about it and now its too late.. You are already dead..

1. Huns and Mongols had superior military technology and tactics. If you study both civilizations (I did, part of my thesis in history), they weren't mindless savages. On the contrary, they had very sophisticated strategies they used that the other countries couldn't counter and both are being studied in various military academies around the world.

For instance, the Hunnic or Mongol bow had far greater range than any other bows around that time. The strength was produced by the double recurve design as well as the materials used. Also, their superior horsemanship allowed them to outmaneuver their clumsy opponents (i.e., European Knights who only knew how to charge forward).

In the (first) Italo-Ethiopian war, the Ethiopians were financed and armed by other Western powers such as Russia (to add, Ethiopia eventually became colonized by Italy, so the superior tech won in the end). Aside from that, they were fighting on home soil. Similar with the Vietnamese, home soil was crucial in their victory.

In a zombie vs. human war, who has home soil? Obviously humans, who are defending their homes and families, and have a much greater motivation to win.

2. Zombies are mindless, so they can easily be drawn and cornered into an area where they can be wiped out. Unmanned drones and robots can be used for this simple purpose.. draw them into one area, then bomb the heck out of them. Would the zombies know what's coming? No way.

3/4. The US government has a massive stockpile of ammunition. Are you going to assume that the outbreak will start WITHIN the military? If that's the case, then you win. However, even my local gun store around the corner has hundreds of grenades and thousands of bullets on sale. I don't think humans would ever have a hard time securing weapons.

I'm not talking about one big battle either. It's simple mechanics.. just like the way the US made Iraq fall to their knees in less than a week. Bombing, air strikes, raids, etc. will take their toll without a single casualty. There's really too much power behind the military now to be threatened by a bunch of wild animals.