ethomaz said:
|
walsufnir said:
But only with sacrifices. There is a lot of stuff happening on screen obviously, way more than many, many other games on current gen, with only Dead Rising 3 even offering more stuff happening on screen. There you have it again: sacrifice fidelity or sacrifice fps.
|
SO? The videos I watched (and posted here) showed a pretty drop in quality to mantain draw distance and jaggies... I don't noticied that "a lot of stuff happening on screen".
But you will call me fanboy... it is fine... the game is neither a graphical or technical showcase.
My point is why Insomniac dropped 60fps after 2009... it weird because their gamer are made to runs at 60fps... Sunset Overdrive is a clear example... Ratchet & Clank become way worst after 30fps... they created fast actions games that benificiates from 60fps.
It is a critical to that bad decision made in 2009... it was a terrible decision.
PS. I can understand Ryse at 30fps for example because it is a slow paced game but SO is a fast paced game... same for Ratchet & Clank games... the drop in quality with 30fps was huge for the franchise.
|
So essentially what I see with your threads, if it puts Xbox in a bad light, you post it. You will go for a story that does this the best. So there can be 50 articles. 49 are positive, 1 is negative, you will post the negative. Then continue in comments to continue the trend. So no one has to call you anything, you make it rather apparent.
You never plan to buy a Xbox one or even play their games, And if you do it is to find the most negative angle you can. So there for you can come in here and make comments like you did above. So only graphics count, not the game play. Good, go buy a pc.
