By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - 1080p 60fps is far from impossible

curl-6 on 14 October 2014
Eddie_Raja said:

I mean they look good but they don't come anywhere near to putting them to shame.  It's debatable. 

Put to shame, no.

Surpass technically, yes.

PS2's GPU was more primitive than GCN and Xbox when it came to shaders.



Around the Network
xl-klaudkil on 15 October 2014
curl-6 said:
Eddie_Raja said:

I mean they look good but they don't come anywhere near to putting them to shame.  It's debatable. 

Put to shame, no.

Surpass technically, yes.

PS2's GPU was more primitive than GCN and Xbox when it came to shaders.

True, but stil games looked great.



 

My youtube gaming page.

http://www.youtube.com/user/klaudkil

curl-6 on 15 October 2014
xl-klaudkil said:
curl-6 said:
Eddie_Raja said:

I mean they look good but they don't come anywhere near to putting them to shame.  It's debatable. 

Put to shame, no.

Surpass technically, yes.

PS2's GPU was more primitive than GCN and Xbox when it came to shaders.

True, but stil games looked great.

Indeed they did, yes.

Just as with the Wii and Wii U, talented artists and technicians can create great looking games even with weaker tech. :)



xl-klaudkil on 17 October 2014
curl-6 said:
xl-klaudkil said:
curl-6 said:
Eddie_Raja said:

I mean they look good but they don't come anywhere near to putting them to shame.  It's debatable. 

Put to shame, no.

Surpass technically, yes.

PS2's GPU was more primitive than GCN and Xbox when it came to shaders.

True, but stil games looked great.

Indeed they did, yes.

Just as with the Wii and Wii U, talented artists and technicians can create great looking games even with weaker tech. :)

We think in the same level my friend!

Such a shame 98% of the gamers dont think that way.

 

Games like uncharted 2 and 3 are waaay better looking than most high end uber pc games quz of the art design and the details.



 

My youtube gaming page.

http://www.youtube.com/user/klaudkil

Dr.Henry_Killinger on 17 October 2014
daredevil.shark said:
xl-klaudkil said:
daredevil.shark said:

First of all I am a pro playstation guy. Now here are my points for OT. Please dont respond without accurate info.


1. Sony "promised" dual 1080p output for all ps3 games. In reality its impossible for ps4. They deceived us.
2. Sony promised CGI type graphics for ps3 games but in reality we have seen how it turned out to be.
3. 99% multiplats performed poorly in ps3. Example, red dead redemption was 640p in ps3 with various issues.

That games 1080p performance is like rubbing salt in the old wound. I am not bashing Sony. But stating some facts.


So your saying its not accurate that whipEout hd is 1080 p  60pfs?  Owkej if ya think soo buddy.

 

Ps4 can easily do 1080 p with 60fps ass can the xbox one but here is the  blockpoint.

People cry to much about how AMAAZING OMFG its not pc graphics to much hence there pushing the console's to far..

Its graphics-FPS-gameplay   where it SHOULD BE! FPS-gameplay-graphics.


You have completely missed my point. My point was every single ps3 games should have run at dual 1080p "accoring to sony's claim" but instead we get nothing (except this game). How does it feel? I feel betrayed when PS3 came out. Fortunately I didnt purchased it at that time.

A ps2 port running at 1080p 60fps in ps3? Is it impressive. Nope. Not at all.

Why are your putting PC here? Did I mentioned PC? Nope. Please read my comment. Plus here everyone knows I am pro playstation gamer yet I am saying these.

And you cant deny my points because sony promised and didnt deliver theose features.

Your point is off topic. What does Sony's claim have to do with the performance of Wipeout and the theoretical performance of the PS4/XB1.

OP says PS3 can do it ergo PS4/XB1 should be able to do it. I'd even go in so far as to lump WII u in there cause its more powerful than PS3 too.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Around the Network
iTechHeads on 17 October 2014

Of course its possible but for many games its just not worth the time it would take to optimize it. Unless the game is competitive it really doesn't need 60FPS IMO.



xl-klaudkil on 17 October 2014
iTechHeads said:
Of course its possible but for many games its just not worth the time it would take to optimize it. Unless the game is competitive it really doesn't need 60FPS IMO.


I disagree.

In this day and age i think every game should run without framerate problems.

If that means 720p  30fps soo be  it...Yet they cant do it...



 

My youtube gaming page.

http://www.youtube.com/user/klaudkil