By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - The Mod Team: Questions, Comments, Concerns? Ask Here!

enlightenedmaster on 18 June 2015
Aeolus451 said:
enlightenedmaster said:
Aeolus451 said:
enlightenedmaster said:

the E3 conference had just ended,there was no video for comparison as it hadn't been uploaded by SONY

and it was an E3 thread on SONY E3 conference day so it was directed at anybody who saw it,its common sense

You could of recorded it or took pics then edited it yourself and found footage of the older version of the game to do the comparison. You can't expect mods to not lock a thread with just "the last guardian graphics were bad" as the op. That's common sense.

edited?...................................when you watch E3 press conferences,you don't edit.you just watch and have fun.SONY posted the press conference video 1-2hours after,then i could but mod never gave me time.

also for an E3 reaction or discussion thread,you don't need video as if people are gamers,they watch E3 and last guardians was one of the most anticipated games,you can't expect them not to watch.

if you check the thread,most people watched the E3 conference and replyed accordingly,they didn't have a problems and in E3 threads  you dodn't always have time.you need to launch thread to stimulate a conversation.

many E3 threads have been made with just the title,even nothing in OP.checkout the FF7 thread and many more throughout the years.

also the reason,the mod locked it was because of 'Baiting' not because of nothing in the thread which i totally explained,i am a hardcore SONY fan and expect alot from SONY and LAST GUARDIAN after 8 years.


It's simple.

Your thread was probably seen as baiting because the OP had virtually no content to it. It doesn't matter what camp you're from. 

Look at how other users responded to your thread. Why are you even asking why it was locked?

just because your cannot reasonally win an argument doesn't mean you try to put it away jokingly

and PEOPLE responded PERFECTLY NORMAL to my thread,there was not a bit wrong with it.MANY agreed and SOME disagreed,thats the point of threads and debate



Around the Network
Aeolus451 on 18 June 2015
enlightenedmaster said:
Aeolus451 said:


It's simple.

Your thread was probably seen as baiting because the OP had virtually no content to it. It doesn't matter what camp you're from. 

Look at how other users responded to your thread. Why are you even asking why it was locked?

just because your cannot reasonally win an argument doesn't mean you try to put it away jokingly

and PEOPLE responded PERFECTLY NORMAL to my thread,there was not a bit wrong with it.MANY agreed and SOME disagreed,thats the point of threads and debate


Actually, once I realize that I'm trying to convince a turtle what flying is like or that I get bored of the conversation, I move on. 



gergroy on 18 June 2015
Miguel_Zorro said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
I need advice , is it worth to get banned by replying to LudicrousSpeed on this thread ?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=203801&page=1

I f i reply to him i will be banned if i dont reply i will feel bad.


If you have a problem with a post, just report it.


Reporting it wouldn't do any good as he wasn't breaking any rules.  He was just talking about his incredibly controversial opinion...



Aura7541 on 19 June 2015
Miguel_Zorro said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
I need advice , is it worth to get banned by replying to LudicrousSpeed on this thread ?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=203801&page=1

I f i reply to him i will be banned if i dont reply i will feel bad.


If you have a problem with a post, just report it.

As gergroy said, he technically did not break any rules. Despite that, though, his post was kinda disturbing...



NiKKoM on 19 June 2015

How long will smeags be gone? We can't survive without his sexyness.. There will chaos everywhere... We'll rebel in absence of his sexyness!



 

Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!) 

Around the Network
Mummelmann on 20 June 2015
padib said:
Mummelmann said:
Are people seriously questioning whether or not RWH baits with posts and threads? Comparing this user to Toastboy is completely justified in my opinion, as someone who has seen his history and even moderated him myself; this is not something to be argued, it's simply a fact that this has been his game for some time.

Aeolus451; überlol...

I'm sorry, but I really do not agree.

For example, in a year after RWH is gone, we won't be talking about him like we're talking about toastboy. Toastboy was a phenomenon, RWH is just a guy that posts here and there and rarely even makes thread (tally is 58 vs 1411). RWH is new (1 year old) while toastboy was a longtime member (since 2008), we had time to figure out toastboy.

I'd just prefer if something so obvious weren't blurred like I'm seeing right now. RWH is not toastboy, not by a long shot.

Then we're just going to have to disagree. I've seen the history when I was a mod and one seriously cannot question that he has an agenda, in my honest opinion. The whole thing might hinge on the fact that he takes jabs in a direction that doesn't bother you as much, that doesn't mean he doesn't take them.

We obviously have different opinions on this user, which stems from his preferences and/or bias. As a former mod, I place him and toastboy in the same category, although toastboy was more obvious at most times.

Ironically, you adressed the whole stealth jab issue and then end up defending one of the worst offenders of that exact thing in the very same thread.



Veknoid_Outcast on 20 June 2015
NiKKoM said:
How long will smeags be gone? We can't survive without his sexyness.. There will chaos everywhere... We'll rebel in absence of his sexyness!

Sexiness comes with a price!

Every now and then Smeags needs to commission a full-length portrait of himself, so that the portrait will age and fade while he retains his youthful charm and vigor.



Protendo on 23 June 2015

Can someone link me to the June's US Amazon ranking. I was going to update console listings like I try to do every week, but I can't find it.

Found it!  For some reason using the earch feature for "Amazon June", "Amazon US", "Amazon June US", and "June" weren't finding it.



How are the next-gen consoles trending on social media?  Why are they popular? Join Social Media Monthly to find out what everyone is talking about!

"And everyone's Kickstarter has merit." - Malory Archer 

Samus Aran on 25 June 2015

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7389560

This isn't a post worth banning about guys. And no, that isn't flaming what so ever. It was rather polite.

It's rather annoying that you ban people for posts like this, but not the people who constantly downplay anything about a certain company.



Leadified on 25 June 2015
Samus Aran said:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7389560

This isn't a post worth banning about guys. And no, that isn't flaming what so ever. It was rather polite.

It's rather annoying that you ban people for posts like this, but not the people who constantly downplay anything about a certain company.

There was a warning earlier in the thread that advised against making posts to bait other users. The warning itself was triggered specifically by bait aimed at Dr. Vita, calling him out on previous predictions and to mock him. Ryng's post, which was after the warning, continued the bait from earlier in the thread by telling Dr. Vita to "accept you were wrong". Along with that, the last sentence in the post, "Just, when you make a prediction, don't be so sure like you usually are..." shows what the intent behind this post is, the same which triggered the warning before and likewise considered as bait. So to enforce the warning, a ban was issued.