By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Can PS4 Handle Assassins Creed Unity 1080p? I think not homies

 

Will the Next Assassins Creed be Da Bomb?

Hell yes 42 42.42%
 
Hellz yes homie 56 56.57%
 
Total:98
Kane1389 on 07 October 2014
toastboy44562 said:
wary-wallaroo said:

They said pretty clearly that they're holding it back at parity to "avoid debates and stuff"

 

All these ifs, and buts might have flown with Destiny, but it's pretty clear cut this time (suprisingly clear)


They never said that stop lying. Also, you posted immediately after I posted the thread so I am assuming you only read the title.


...

Why isnt this person banned yet?



Around the Network
curl-6 on 07 October 2014
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
curl-6 said:

Definitely possible. The CPU is the weakest link in all three current gen systems, so it makes sense it would be the first part to bottleneck, necessitating the GPGPUs to step in and help at the cost of graphical oomph.

If the game is limited by CPU it must be terribly optimized. The very reason none of the manufacturers prioritized CPU was because GPU development is moving much faster and that modern games prioritize doing everything on the GPU. Especially in the case of Graphics were using the CPU for rendering is only really acceptable on mobile platforms.

The only reason XB1 even has the best CPU is because it was intended to run multiple OSes and multitask better than the PS4, not for games.

I'd be surprised if the PC reqs were anything decent. Hell, I ran WDs with a 2009 laptop CPU, granted my integrated gpu choked on the graphics but if CPU is really a bottleneck then Ubisoft is being deliberatly incompetent.

If the GPUs have to step in and cover for the CPU, wouldn't that incur a GPU performance hit though?



Jimbo1337 on 07 October 2014
dane007 said:
Update:

Ubisoft has provided the following statement to GamesBeat:

“We understand how senior producer Vincent Pontbriand’s’s quotes have been misinterpreted. To set the record straight, we did not lower the specs for Assassin’s Creed Unity to account for any one system over the other.

“Assassin’s Creed Unity has been engineered from the ground up for next-generation consoles. Over the past 4 years, we have created Assassin’s Creed Unity to attain the tremendous level of quality we have now achieved on Xbox One, PlayStation 4 and PC. It’s a process of building up toward our goals, not scaling down, and we’re proud to say that we have reached those goals on all SKUs.

“At no point did we decide to reduce the ambitions of any SKU. All benefited from the full dedication of all of our available optimization resources to help them reach the level of quality we have today with the core Assassin’s Creed Unity experience.”

I think the bigger picture here is that Ubisoft should be ashamed of themselves for putting out a 900p game @ 30 fps when launch ps3 and XB360 games came out at 720p @ 30 fps NINE years ago.  How is 900p @ 30fps "tremendous level of quality" that they seemed to have been working on for the past 4 years?

While Ubisoft releases another disappointment, just like watchdogs, all of the other game developers will blow them out of the water.  



Avro1958 on 07 October 2014

I can't find the link to the MS/Assassins Creed: Unity marketing deal... I know I seen it but I can't find it... Help me :-p



HoloDust on 07 October 2014
curl-6 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

If the game is limited by CPU it must be terribly optimized. The very reason none of the manufacturers prioritized CPU was because GPU development is moving much faster and that modern games prioritize doing everything on the GPU. Especially in the case of Graphics were using the CPU for rendering is only really acceptable on mobile platforms.

The only reason XB1 even has the best CPU is because it was intended to run multiple OSes and multitask better than the PS4, not for games.

I'd be surprised if the PC reqs were anything decent. Hell, I ran WDs with a 2009 laptop CPU, granted my integrated gpu choked on the graphics but if CPU is really a bottleneck then Ubisoft is being deliberatly incompetent.

If the GPUs have to step in and cover for the CPU, wouldn't that incur a GPU performance hit though?

PS4 with its async compute was engineered so that additional compute load on GPU does not impact too much graphic tasks. Look up that old Cerny's interview on Gamasutra for more thorough explanation....also Sucker Punch tech breakdown of inFamous SS.

Anyway, doesn't really matter, since higher resolution needs more GPU resources, not CPU...and thats's what PS4 has over XOne...basically Ubi guy was full of shit.



Around the Network
Barenziah on 07 October 2014
Kane1389 said:
toastboy44562 said:
wary-wallaroo said:

They said pretty clearly that they're holding it back at parity to "avoid debates and stuff"

 

All these ifs, and buts might have flown with Destiny, but it's pretty clear cut this time (suprisingly clear)


They never said that stop lying. Also, you posted immediately after I posted the thread so I am assuming you only read the title.


...

Why isnt this person banned yet?


because PS4 sold 11m



  

I smell like the dark forest of Dwemereth in the morning mist                                                   fanboy til i'm bankrupt

Dr.Henry_Killinger on 07 October 2014
Barenziah said:
Kane1389 said:
toastboy44562 said:
wary-wallaroo said:

They said pretty clearly that they're holding it back at parity to "avoid debates and stuff"

 

All these ifs, and buts might have flown with Destiny, but it's pretty clear cut this time (suprisingly clear)


They never said that stop lying. Also, you posted immediately after I posted the thread so I am assuming you only read the title.


...

Why isnt this person banned yet?


because PS4 sold 11m

Can't have one without they other.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Barenziah on 07 October 2014
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
Barenziah said:
Kane1389 said:
toastboy44562 said:
wary-wallaroo said:

They said pretty clearly that they're holding it back at parity to "avoid debates and stuff"

 

All these ifs, and buts might have flown with Destiny, but it's pretty clear cut this time (suprisingly clear)


They never said that stop lying. Also, you posted immediately after I posted the thread so I am assuming you only read the title.


...

Why isnt this person banned yet?


because PS4 sold 11m

Can't have one without they other.

yes you can

sony PS4 sells most wins the gen and mods moderate boxtrolls

why not,it is fair and reasonable but for some reason people are just a bit salty PS4 came out crunching



  

I smell like the dark forest of Dwemereth in the morning mist                                                   fanboy til i'm bankrupt

Bullsrun on 07 October 2014

Double the power of an x1, so yahh it can handle it. Unless payed not to, i'm sure it cost quite a bit. A simple clause "X1 version must be equal to its competitor "in the contract and we are debating purchased parity and pretending power differences don't exist.



Alby_da_Wolf on 08 October 2014

Tagged for teh lulz.



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW!