curl-6 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
If the game is limited by CPU it must be terribly optimized. The very reason none of the manufacturers prioritized CPU was because GPU development is moving much faster and that modern games prioritize doing everything on the GPU. Especially in the case of Graphics were using the CPU for rendering is only really acceptable on mobile platforms.
The only reason XB1 even has the best CPU is because it was intended to run multiple OSes and multitask better than the PS4, not for games.
I'd be surprised if the PC reqs were anything decent. Hell, I ran WDs with a 2009 laptop CPU, granted my integrated gpu choked on the graphics but if CPU is really a bottleneck then Ubisoft is being deliberatly incompetent.
|
If the GPUs have to step in and cover for the CPU, wouldn't that incur a GPU performance hit though?
|
PS4 with its async compute was engineered so that additional compute load on GPU does not impact too much graphic tasks. Look up that old Cerny's interview on Gamasutra for more thorough explanation....also Sucker Punch tech breakdown of inFamous SS.
Anyway, doesn't really matter, since higher resolution needs more GPU resources, not CPU...and thats's what PS4 has over XOne...basically Ubi guy was full of shit.
