No...I was a bit surprised but in the end I dont care. This is from the same guy who will argue to heaven and hell for Nintendo ( against companies with libraries better than all of Tecmo Koei) but when I actually say a Nintendos legacy with Zelda are beyond Tecmo and that isnt even on par with Nintendo your argumentative nature kicks in. One game doesnt absolve the rest. If you like Fatal Frame over Zelda thats completely fine. If I laugh its because youre saying something completely new. Refreshing quite frankly.

I played it at a gamestop and I really liked it but not better than any zelda game

I'm not a black and white guy. Some things about Nintendo I consider worthy of praise, other things I criticise them for. In my time here, I've been labelled both a Nintendo fanboy and a Nintendo hater, so obviously I'm doing something right if the extremists on both sides don't like me. ;)

Similarly, some Zelda games I adore, others I dislike.

Ive never seen you criticize Nintendo. Most of the times I see you its because your in a war with someone because you're defending them.

In all seriousness though, from what I've played of the in-store demo, no. It'll ultimately be an enjoyable romp through the Zelda universe, but there's no way it's better than an actual Zelda game IMO.

Then you haven't read many of my posts here.

I frequently slam Nintendo for their rampant delays of important software, self-harming businss decisions, and refusal to adapt to the market.

Are you joking man? Or are you serious? Comparing a warriors spin off with a main line zelda feels wrong.

I'm serious. Wind Waker's sailing and Majora's time mechanic completely turned me off, but Hyrule Warriors kept me entertained with its mindless but empowering action.

Yes.

I prefer Hyrule warriors over Zelda SS...maybe even more than Zelda TP.

I didn't liked these two zelda at all, i stoped SS after the second boss, and it was hard to finish TP without getting bored.

My head hurts.