Come on guys, you're doing it wrong. It's on the Wii U, therefore of course it's better than NMS. Why even question it?

You're right, I just don't understand how anybody could be more hyped up about a game with an interesting concept and a few trailers than this screenshot.

SUCH A MYSTERY.

>No Gameplay
>Looks to be much better
>lol

Riding through that awesome track.... Feeling the air waving my hair... Going under that giant tube... Feeling the warm sun in my face... I can feel the hype already... zzz... zzz....

because it's a racing game (right?), while No Man's Sky is a frickin infinite universe spacesim.

Never played a racer bef-

Here's why. No Man's Sky and Fast Racing Neo are both third party. Even though they're cheap indie games and they're both guaranteed to be overrated because of the price, they're also third party.

Third party games sell on Sony and Microsoft consoles. Most Nintendo fans don't even blink at anything third party on Nintendo consoles. Mystery solved.

It could also be that No Man's Sky has been hyped up for awhile while no one's heard of this game. That, and as good as Wipeout is, it doesn't have a very large fanbase. Look at how amazingly well Wipeout 2048 sold on the Vita as a launch title. It sold so well that Sony closed down Liverpool Studios.

So...Shovel Knight?

Isn't it obvious? A racing game, a rather known quantity as far as genre's go, and No Man's Sky...a game you have no possible chance of seeing completely explored in your lifetime, or likely humanities lifetime. That doesn't assure a quality title of course, but it is something different, presented in an intriguing way and we know just enough about it to pique our interest, and not enough to start dismantling lol.