By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - 20 new AAA games or Minecraft

 

You have $2 billion to use on games what would you spend it on

20 new AAA games 345 89.38%
 
Minecraft 41 10.62%
 
Total:386

20 new AAA games.



Around the Network
Dark_Feanor said:
If only was so easy...

Why no Apple comes and create 400 AAA games with the money they have cashed in?

Or Facebook 100 AAA games with the money spent on Whatsapp?

This guy knows what's up.

It isn't as simple as a this or that question. Many things influence their decisions I'm sure. It's a business strategy. Microsoft is expanding it's horizons and it will probably be a good move for them in the end. 



 Been away for a bit, but sneaking back in.

Gaming on: PS4, PC, 3DS. Got a Switch! Mainly to play Smash

Just to remember, most of the casual costumers don't care about the publisher and the creator of the IP left the company... And beeing a extremely simply looking game and selling a lot like it (besides having creativity already quite good sorted out) I don't see how they would make a sequel to capitalize the name and make 50M more sales or how good they would do on a new IP... probably blow money.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Where the heck did they get those numbers? Katrina cost close to 100 billion dollars in 2005 USD, not 45 million and Afghanistan GDP number is also wrong.

Edit: Image URL is P4R Gaming, hahahaha.



Another of those thread... The OP does not get it at all.

They are not buying a GAME but a brand... And a VERY successful one...
For instance do you think the Halo brand value is less than 2.5 billion?



Around the Network
Imaginedvl said:
Another of those thread... The OP does not get it at all.

They are not buying a GAME but a brand... And a VERY successful one...
For instance do you think the Halo brand value is less than 2.5 billion?


Maybe you don't het the OP and are being hasty to defend a MS move...

He is just asking each person if it was their decision they would preffer to invest in 20 AAA or buying Minecraft... I can certainly see why most gamers would decide for having more games to play instead of trying to defend why a corporate bought a brand.

Halo is certainly quite valuable, but do you see Minecraft 2, 3, 4, reach and BCC having close sales to the original? Or the movie and TV series?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:
Imaginedvl said:
Another of those thread... The OP does not get it at all.

They are not buying a GAME but a brand... And a VERY successful one...
For instance do you think the Halo brand value is less than 2.5 billion?


Maybe you don't het the OP and are being hasty to defend a MS move...

He is just asking each person if it was their decision they would preffer to invest in 20 AAA or buying Minecraft... I can certainly see why most gamers would decide for having more games to play instead of trying to defend why a corporate bought a brand.

Halo is certainly quite valuable, but do you see Minecraft 2, 3, 4, reach and BCC having close sales to the original? Or the movie and TV series?

Seriously bringing MS defense shit in your response is just so childish. Chill out, evrything is not about MS vs Sony you know.

Perfectly understood the OP and my point is exactly about it. Buying Minecraft is not only about the game... I'm not going to explain it again if you cannot comprehend why. So asking for a AAA game vs Minecraft is just pointless as you need to take into consideration other factor such as the brand value which is in that case WAY more than the game itself.



20 Games > 1 Game



Imaginedvl said:
DonFerrari said:
Imaginedvl said:
Another of those thread... The OP does not get it at all.

They are not buying a GAME but a brand... And a VERY successful one...
For instance do you think the Halo brand value is less than 2.5 billion?


Maybe you don't het the OP and are being hasty to defend a MS move...

He is just asking each person if it was their decision they would preffer to invest in 20 AAA or buying Minecraft... I can certainly see why most gamers would decide for having more games to play instead of trying to defend why a corporate bought a brand.

Halo is certainly quite valuable, but do you see Minecraft 2, 3, 4, reach and BCC having close sales to the original? Or the movie and TV series?

Seriously bringing MS defense shit in your response is just so childish. Chill out, evrything is not about MS vs Sony you know.

Perfectly understood the OP and my point is exactly about it. Buying Minecraft is not only about the game... I'm not going to explain it again if you cannot comprehend why. So asking for a AAA game vs Minecraft is just pointless as you need to take into consideration other factor such as the brand value which is in that case WAY more than the game itself.

You didnt understand the OP, if you had, you would understand he was talking about gamers point of view and not corporate pov so we dont care about the brand value for them.



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

Aerys said:
Imaginedvl said:

Seriously bringing MS defense shit in your response is just so childish. Chill out, evrything is not about MS vs Sony you know.

Perfectly understood the OP and my point is exactly about it. Buying Minecraft is not only about the game... I'm not going to explain it again if you cannot comprehend why. So asking for a AAA game vs Minecraft is just pointless as you need to take into consideration other factor such as the brand value which is in that case WAY more than the game itself.

You didnt understand the OP, if you had, you would understand he was talking about gamers point of view and not corporate pov so we dont care about the brand value for them.

lol yah right... The OP is talking about Gamers point of view specificaly on a sales website. Okay, I guess I missed that specific sentence :)

Look, you may want or believe that we should be talking about a gamer point of view but in no way the OP is asking about a gamer point of view specicaly , esp while posting dev. cost... It may be the case and it may be more conveniant to you tho. And Don Ferarri is just trying to start shit with his MS defense force comment.