| Imaginedvl said: Another of those thread... The OP does not get it at all. They are not buying a GAME but a brand... And a VERY successful one... For instance do you think the Halo brand value is less than 2.5 billion? |
Maybe you don't het the OP and are being hasty to defend a MS move...
He is just asking each person if it was their decision they would preffer to invest in 20 AAA or buying Minecraft... I can certainly see why most gamers would decide for having more games to play instead of trying to defend why a corporate bought a brand.
Halo is certainly quite valuable, but do you see Minecraft 2, 3, 4, reach and BCC having close sales to the original? Or the movie and TV series?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
