Agree with this. You cant really trust anyone, ass everybody has a biase that influences their score. Worst is when they dont even play the game and just rate it a 10 or a 0.

I personally will not get this game cuz I dont like multyplayer shooters, but I see no reason to ruin the experience for anyone else.

But dosent metacritic have a separate score? one for critics and one for players?

Yeaa but there are no critic scores yet interestly enough which is why the dude is ragging on about the user score since he has nothing better to do then state the obvious

I think Metacritic is broken. It often appears to aggregate reviews that we can seem to find on Metacritic. The scoring is suspect too.

Take for example ... your review of ZombiU! I should have screenshot it, but they put your review down as a 0 once -- but that issue seems to have been corrected itself.

I read about a guy who gave it a zero because it wasn't like Diablo 3 and someone else give it a zero because it was revenge against PS4 for doing great or something.

So it is slightly overhyped afterall.

Anyway, I always thought metacritic should go. And companies should not be allowed to give the review copies on the day of the release - not enough time for people to review the games.

Well... it's a war between fanboys and haters. Wait some time till they equal each other and then you have a pretty fair score.

At least user reviews don't really count for the real Metascore!

Actually I enjoy the reader reviews, anything under 5/10 is trolling and same with 10/10.... User review can give a different perspective....

Nobody really cares about user reviews though,